Search for: "In Re Marriage of Murray"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
This was the rationale for the Bush administration’s marriage promotion initiatives, it’s a frequent theme in David Brooks columns, and it’s a centerpiece of Charles Murray’s new book. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:31 am
Then we had the case of Re T, in which the High Court dealt with the awful scenario of a contact application by a father who had been convicted of the manslaughter of the mother. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Most everyday citizens won’t encounter the Commonwealth Court unless they’re suing the government or if they’re appealing a workers’ compensation or unemployment decision. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:20 pm
The author’s “realistic demand” misses the point that ending the war on drugs doesn’t even allow for Wall Street to invest in pharmaceutical companies at all; re-legalizing drugs does. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:15 am
Such things like hanging a child over a balcony, whether his “marriage” was real or just for show, and raise concern about molestation. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:59 am
” (In re Marriage of Murray (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 581, 594.) [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
”Health Benefits: FEDS ABANDON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BAN BUT FIGHT SPOUSAL HEALTH BENEFITS, Golinski v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:41 am
SmackThat's marriage. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm
Against a backdrop of the UK’s rather conservative approach to advertising law firms and legal services, they’re all the more outlandish. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:21 am
The couple had three children during their 15-year marriage. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
Andy Murray gave Wimbledon his best shot but was found wanting. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:33 pm
Murray, The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, Simon & Schuster, 1994, page 176) [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:33 pm
Murray, The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, Simon & Schuster, 1994, page 176) [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 1:40 am
I note that the intended parents (unlike Re Michael: Surrogacy) appeared to be eligible to adopt in South Australia. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 9:37 am
What about recognising tax, recognising marriage in the tax system? [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 12:57 pm
"If you're still linked through the house, than you're not really divorced," says Kelly Lise Murray, a Harvard-trained lawyer and Nashville real estate agent. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 7:45 pm
Unlike permanent spousal support, there is no time frame for when temporary spousal support should end In Re Marriage of Murray, (2002) 101 Cal.App. 4th 581, p. 594, the Court held that "awards of temporary spousal support rest within the broad discretion of the trial court and may be ordered in ‘any amount' subject only to the moving party's needs and the other party's ability to pay. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 2:19 pm
' The harm is we're increasing a pattern of relationships that's not good for children. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:07 am
Should Juvenile Offenders Be Tried As Adults? [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:49 am
For example, the current child tax credit, the 10 percent income bracket, and "marriage penalty" relief all have bipartisan support. [read post]
