Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel"
Results 41 - 60
of 893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2023, 10:19 am
The IMR reviewer concluded that this type of medication switch is appropriate when a medication is not working adequately. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
Asking the Supreme Court to review a lower court decision is always something we take seriously. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
In Stirling, South Carolina seeks review of a decision by a divided panel of the U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:15 am
Customary international law further regulates the conduct of hostilities by all belligerents, and provides protections for civilians and civilian objects (such as medical facilities, schools, etc. that are not in military use). [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Second Circuit: Maybe, but qualified immunity so we're not going to tell you. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 9:25 am
This involved a medical malpractice lawsuit wherein the defendant hospital lost/destroyed the plaintiff’s medical records – which her expert witness needed to review in order to provide his testimony. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court to review the ruling is very high. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Pandemic legislation changes FDA staffing and procedures so that they’re more in line with the rules surrounding prescription drugs, and this caused the FDA to produce an 89-page review. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Earlier this year, when we reviewed potential themes for this year’s edition of the Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis , we decided to feature workplace violence prominently. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 8:40 am
Yeah, was a really good conference and really enjoyed the speakers and the panels. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:03 am
Therefore, the appellate panel ruled the second count should have been filed as a medical malpractice case. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
So they're not federal officials. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
The post Week in Review first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:07 pm
And sure enough, what they're talking about for the new police review board is as crazy as what a similar collection of personally ambitious goofballs concocted for the new city charter.The group proposes a 33-member board, for instance, an unusually large size for a decision-making panel... [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
At the same time, the re creation of the dynamics of either, especially for the best of intentions produces the impulse toward the sort of national infantilization that might have been understood as a cornerstone for the justification of 20th century empire. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 12:58 pm
Well, then you've created what the Fourth Circuit calls "somewhat involved procedural issues" and two-thirds of this panel says you're out of luck. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
The parallel Deputy Commissioner structure is intended to indicate the equal importance of the foods and medical products mandates within FDA, although it addresses components of the Agency outside of the Panel’s charge and the Panel did not evaluate the need for a second Deputy Commissioner. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
There is something for everyone in this decision, and counsel is urged to read and re-read this decision whenever a vocational expert is expected to be used in a case. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part I reviews the key stages in the development of the UN climate change regime. [read post]
