Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc."
Results 41 - 60
of 983
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Opinion in In re Paternity of F.T.R. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
The UK Supreme Court was divided 3-2 in the recent appeal of Re an application by JR 38 for Judicial Review [2015] UKSC 42 on whether the ECHR, art 8, was engaged for a child aged 14 who was suspected of involvement in criminal rioting. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:13 pm
The n-word's been used by the California Supreme Court and California Supreme Court in 617 opinions (both published and unpublished) contained in Westlaw. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:23 pm
(Orin Kerr) The more I re-read Judge Leon’s opinion in Klayman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:42 pm
Nine of them, or one in about every 111,000 are on the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
The UK Supreme Court was divided 3-2 in the recent appeal of Re an application by JR 38 for Judicial Review ([2015] UKSC 42) on whether Article 8 ECHR was engaged for a child aged 14 who was suspected of involvement in criminal rioting. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Samsung v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:17 am
Just like they control what team you play for in the minor leagues, how long you're bound to a given club once you're drafted, etc. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
Tarver v City of Sheridan Board of Adjustment, 2014 WL 2535251 (WY 6/5/2014) The decision can be accessed at: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Documents/Opinions/2014WY71.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, Res Judicata [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:24 am
Two recent Supreme Court decisions interpreting the Lanham Act will provide companies with more flexibility in policing their competitor’s product claims.The Supreme Court recently issued Lanham Act opinions in Lexmark International v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:19 pm
In your opinion, at the earliest, how likely are we to get a decision from the Supreme Court? [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:04 pm
Beijing Science & Technology University (1999) (re-issued as guiding case #38) and Yang Baoxi v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 12:53 pm
S appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada which re-instated the decisions of the arbitrator and the superior court judge. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:24 am
Because of the Texas Supreme Court's recent opinion in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:14 pm
And, in the end, I don't think this one necessarily is as well.That said, I probably come out somewhere slightly in between the opinion of Chief Justice George, who authors the majority opinion, and Justice Werdegar, who authors the dissent.The California Supreme Court here is basically discussing what should happen with writ petitions. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:17 am
Here goes: We went to a blog post about potential Supreme Court nominees and a (very interesting) debate over the Socratic method broke out. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
In defining that test, the Supreme Court in Joseph relied heavily on the decision of the House of Lords of Kemsley v Foot [1952] A.C. 345. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:26 am
Rewritten opinions may be re-imagined majority opinions, dissents, or concurrences, as appropriate to the court. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:13 pm
Justice Dato doesn't cite the case in today's opinion, but we know from the Supreme Court's opinion in Worldwide Volkswagen that such a foreseeable effect doesn't establish minimum contacts. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
I cannot fathom how the California Supreme Court comes up with an opinion like this one.Check that. [read post]
