Search for: "In Re Promulgation of Rules of Practice" Results 41 - 60 of 640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2023, 2:01 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
We’re unhappy with the USDA’s decision to withdraw the rule, and we’ve denounced it. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:44 am by Marcia Delgadillo
Finally, we’re pleased to welcome Brett Bunnell as a Counsel and Thomas Gaffney as an Associate in our Corporate and Transactional practice group. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:00 pm by beng
“It shouldn’t matter how tall you are or how much you weigh when you’re looking for a job. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:01 am by Josh Richman
  Making sure that one-size-fits-all privacy rules don’t backfire against new entrants and small competitors. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This figure is significantly lower than in 2016, when the Delaware Court of Chancery effectively put an end to the practice of disclosure-only settlements in In re Trulia Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:01 pm by Ioana Gorecki and Donnelly McDowell
As we have discussed at length in other posts, the FTC must meet a number of procedural and substantive requirements before promulgating a rule under its Magnuson-Moss authority, as proposed here. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by John Elwood
” The government argues that legislators lack any personal rights to the information, which they’re only entitled to because of their office. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
While the Commission does not dictate market conditions, it can encourage capital formation by promulgating rules that: (i) are grounded in financial materiality and (ii) adequately consider smaller public companies’ ability to pay for the compliance costs. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm by Guest Author
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court holding that this rule was not properly promulgated, the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
First, while the board has sole discretion (subject to its fiduciary duties) to adopt and exercise the D-Pill without shareholder approval, judicial rulings and market practice contemplate approval of the J-Pill by shareholders.[1] Second, while the D-Pill is a legal instrument, the J-Pill is an informal public “warning” to prospective bidders that their ownership beyond a stated threshold may be diluted by the board’s issuance of stock options to shareholders. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
May an agency revive a defunct rulemaking without notice, and then immediately promulgate a lightly revised version of the proposed rule as a final rule? [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:47 am by Mark Theodore and Dixie Morrison
  The APA exception allows federal agencies to promulgate rules relating to the agency’s internal organization, procedure, or practice—i.e., “housekeeping” rules that do not affect regulated parties’ rights or interests—without notice-and-comment. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:47 am by Mark Theodore and Dixie Morrison
  The APA exception allows federal agencies to promulgate rules relating to the agency’s internal organization, procedure, or practice—i.e., “housekeeping” rules that do not affect regulated parties’ rights or interests—without notice-and-comment. [read post]
Under the rulemaking procedures being followed here, the FTC must seek and consider public comment before promulgating a final rule. [read post]