Search for: "In Re Public Ledger"
Results 41 - 60
of 346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 2:53 pm
Distributed-ledger technology is expected to facilitate the use of smart contracts by permitting the relevant coding to be embedded in the shared ledger while preventing either party from altering that coding. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:20 pm
I don't mean this in a triumphalist fashion, a la Clinton in 1993 -- now that we're in office, we're pulling out the laundry list! [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 10:35 am
So, if you’re interested in learning a little bit more about Bitcoin, read on… What is Bitcoin? [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
“If you’re a lawyer,” they write, “and you think you don’t need to worry about blockchain, think again. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:08 am
Any purchases you make or influence will indirectly support TechnoLawyer by encouraging legal vendors to make sure they're on The TechnoList every year. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:48 am
No doubt there are some equally disappointed kids this year, but it sounds as though they're really going to have something to cheer about next year. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 7:19 am
For example, there are public reports of Marsh working with Arch in covering $150 million in digital assets secured by the Ledger Vault Security Firm,[4] as well as its work with Munich Re for Curv.[5] Assistance sorting through the array of insurance companies offering products. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:09 pm
However, on the blockchain ledger, ascertaining the identity of a shareholder may often require little effort. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:47 pm
It’s easy to image how blockchain, a secure public ledger, could keep track of who owns physical or digital goods. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:46 am
You're screwing up. [read post]
23 May 2017, 6:21 am
Lobbying “White House Moves to Block Ethics Inquiry into Ex-Lobbyists on Payroll” by Eric Lipton for New York Times California: “California Is About to Go Nuts Thanks to Some Fourth-Graders from Merced” by Robert Rodriguez for Fresno Bee Campaign Finance “Michael Flynn Invokes 5th Amendment, Citing ‘Public Frenzy’” by The Associated Press for Portland Oregonian “Supreme Court Affirms Ban on ‘Soft Money’ in Campaigns” by… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:39 am
This entire episode has been a publicity coup for McMillen (as well as great fodder for a future law school essay). [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Don't for a moment think I'm Holier than Thou: Online publications can err as egregiously or more so than mainstream media--certainly if they're unreflective and sensational (I don't need to name names). [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:55 pm
Traffic tickets, small claims court papers and ledgers are some documents Porter County will remove this year. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 10:42 am
As Congress gears up to investigate this issue, we’re frankly worried. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm
Pretrial publicity. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:14 pm
The offerings were integrated in part because of (i) the proximity in time between the SAFT offering and the public sale (the last SAFT was sold on September 11, 2017, one day before the launch of the public sale), (ii) the fact that the tokens issued in the public sale and the tokens underlying the SAFT had the same characteristics, and (iii) the fact that the company failed to distinguish between the funds received through SAFTs and the funds received from the… [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 1:14 pm
Usually, it’s normal practice among developers not to write code from scratch, but to use packages available on public code repositories on the basis of an open source licence instead. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:30 am
Public and private blockchains are distinguished by who is allowed to participate in the network, execute the consensus protocol addressed above, and maintain the shared ledger. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:59 am
I'll let folks know when they're posted and the public hearing set, and encourage anyone interested to submit comments or attend the hearingSee related Grits posts:Were indigency, amnesty programs for Driver Responsibility Surcharge secretly "dropped"? [read post]
