Search for: "In Re Subpoena to Nixon"
Results 41 - 60
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
But they’re wrong for very different reasons. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:10 am
These include: A challenge to the way their election or re-election campaign may have been waged, the issue being whether in order to attain or keep power, they had abused it. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:21 pm
Nixon v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
Taylor Budowich, a Trump spokesman suing to block a subpoena for bank records, argued that “[t]he Select Committee has failed to identify any legislative purpose served by its Subpoena. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Vance, President Donald Trump’s efforts to shield his financial records, including his tax returns, from subpoenas issued to his accountant and lenders by a New York grand jury and three congressional committees. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 8:01 am
” said a posting, referring to President Nixon's secretary and the erased tapes. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Oct. 5, 1973, Brief for the United States in In re Agnew. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:38 pm
Many banks who took it TARP in previous rounds and can find any way to pay it back are doing so as soon as they're able. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:45 am
Nixon, the court ruled a president is not immune from a criminal subpoena. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Richard Nixon was the subject of three articles of impeachment approved by the House Judiciary Committee including obstruction of his re-election committee’s break-in of the Democratic National Committee offices in the Watergate, misuse of federal law enforcement and intelligence for his political ends, and the refusal to comply with Committee subpoenas. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 9:21 pm
Perhaps Congress already recognizes the risk -- and that's why they're pulling publicity stunts. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
“By talking to the government, you’re running an enormous risk of a false statement or perjury,” Bennett said. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm
This morning, the Washington Post reported that the Justice Department sought to prevent former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates from testifying before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) as part of the committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the presidential election. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
You’re going to be advocating some of the things that they’re promoting. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:12 pm
In the Nixon case, regular order was restored. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Nixon, President of the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
Nixon, when the court was ruling on whether Nixon, Richard Nixon, should have to give up his tapes which were subpoenaed. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:44 pm
In 1974, the Supreme Court unanimously signed off on a special prosecutor’s authority in ordering then-president Richard Nixon to turn over subpoenaed tapes. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm
C’mon, admit it; you’re intrigued.) [read post]
