Search for: "In The Matter Of: L.R" Results 41 - 60 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2015, 7:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
There may be Article 78 proceedings in which, because of the urgency of the situation at hand and the difficulty of fairly protecting the interest of nonparty members of the class, a court may as a matter of discretion reject class treatment of the proceeding. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:44 am by Andrew Frisch
Regions Financial Corporation  This case was before the court for consideration of the parties’ Joint Statement regarding restrictions on communications with putative class members, as required by L.R. 23.1(C)(2) of the Northern District of Georgia. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:26 pm by Carolyn E. Wright
L.R. 16-15.4 Many CACD judges will presumptively refer a case for option 2 or 3. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 3:53 pm by Chuck Cosson
  I eschew the term “big data” in this blog, however, because I find the core principles of personal privacy and basic fairness persist no matter how large the data set, and both the issues and associated rules existed well before today’s innovations. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
 A procedural mess followed, with the case going up to the 9th Circuit, then up to the SCOTUS (on the issue of a bankruptcy court’s power to decide probate matters), then back to the 9th Circuit. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms F obtained an injunction for the leaseholders’ re-entry in November and this matter went to trial. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms F obtained an injunction for the leaseholders’ re-entry in November and this matter went to trial. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
Perhaps the most controversial provision of British Columbia’s new Wills, Estates and Succession Act coming into effect on March 31, 2014, is section 58 which will allow the Court to give effect as a will to a document, or an electronic record, that does not meet the formal criteria for a valid will in British Columbia, if the Court is satisfied that it represents the “testamentary intentions of a deceased person. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Alice Woolley
L.R. (5th) 1, 2011 ABCA 94 at paras 23-29; leave to SCC denied, [2011] SCCA No. 260 (QL). [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 12:50 pm by Woodrow Pollack
 (NOTE: In my defense, that joint motion that I filed years ago did indicate that filings under seal would only be done according to local rule, but we revised the motion when we refiled it to explicitly incorporate the provisions of L.R. 1.09.) [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
No matter how many times these allegations are repeated, all available evidence shows concerns over research and innovation to be unfounded. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:43 pm by Cathy
The hearing involving Prenda Law that I described in the previous post soon resulted in a ruling, which I again summarized on Popehat. [read post]