Search for: "In re: Brunetti"
Results 41 - 60
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2018, 3:01 am
Tam and In re Brunetti have freed up more words for registration as trademarks? [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:24 am
Brunetti (2019)). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:29 am
"(6-7) (quoting In re Brunetti, 877 F.3d 1330, 1336 (Fed. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 5:08 am
The Guide notes the immoral/scandalous portion of Section 2(a) is pending a similar constitutional review before the Federal Circuit in In re Brunetti, in which the USPTO refused registration of the mark FUCT for athletic apparel. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 4:32 am
"One way a proposed mark fails to function is if consumers will view it as a merely informational slogan or phrase instead of something that 'point[s] out distinctively the origin of the goods [or services] to which it is attached.'" In re Brunetti, 2022 USPQ2d 764. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
” In re Elster, No. 20202205 (Fed. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 5:03 pm
Hot off the heels of this ruling, in December 2017 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down the decision of In Re: Erik Brunetti (Brunetti). [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 5:03 pm
Hot off the heels of this ruling, in December 2017 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down the decision of In Re: Erik Brunetti (Brunetti). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
See In re Brunetti, however this case focuses on the Scandalous Provision. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 8:43 am
” The case is In Re: Erik Brunetti, No. 2015-1109 (Fed. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:32 am
” In re Brunetti, 2022 USPQ2d 764, at *12. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
Did Brunetti correctly apply Tam? [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
”[5] The applicant appealed the PTAB’s denial to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which is now deciding whether Section 1052(c) is unconstitutional in violation of the First Amendment,[6] as that court and the Supreme Court have already decided with respect to the provisions in the Lanham Act barring registration of scandalous, immoral, or disparaging marks.[7] Unlike the bars on registration at issue in Tam and Brunetti, the PTO’s ban on registration… [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:53 am
Or if you're more interested in the classics, you can download and listen to Charles Dickens' Bleak House. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:58 am
Tam and In re Brunetti, Foster contended that the false connection provision of Section 2(a) is unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
In re Brunetti, Appeal No. 2015-1109 (Fed. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 3:19 am
" In re Brunetti, 2022 USPQ3d 764, at *9. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
The case is In re Elster, 26 F.4th 1328, 2022 USPQ2d 195 (Fed. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:18 am
Brunetti, 2022 WL 3644733, at *19. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am
Richard Re previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
