Search for: "In re A.H." Results 41 - 60 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2021, 10:47 am by Brandie Jefferson
Their scholarly work has contributed to advancing knowledge, and we’re fortunate to have such talented scholars at WashU. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
  That the legislature chose to treat prescription drugs and prescription medical products in the same fashion is also a strong indication of what Texas law is.Since we’re dealing with the common law, we should point out that, with respect to design defects, [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
They're conservative down there, right? [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
”  In re Initial Public Offerings Securities Litigation, 471 F.3d 24, 45 (2d Cir. 2006). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by Jim Dedman
We're not certain why The Times chose to celebrate an arbitrary 80 years of existence. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am by Ashley Morgan
Amniotic Fluid / Amniotic Membrane Tissue Audits, Investigations and Prosecutions are Continuing to Climb in 2022 (August 4, 2022): Over the past year, we have seen a significant increase in the number of Medicare administrative audits, False Claims Act investigations and criminal prosecutions by the Department of Justice (DOJ), related to the billing of allogeneic (harvested from someone else) stem cell products. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
The court threw out a lot of claims but not all of them.We're going to go through Guinan I first, but quickly (yeah, right, we know you guys), because it's necessary to understand Guinan II - the one we're most interested in.The remaining claims in Guinan I were malpractice (medical negligence), informed consent, fraud/misrepresentation, and medical monitoring.The first question was choice of law. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
A decision earlier this month by an upstate appellate court in a corporate dissolution proceeding called Matter of Stevens (Allied Builders, Inc.), 2010 NY Slip Op 05066 (4th Dept June 11, 2010), adds uncertainty to the already fuzzy array of precedents surrounding the question whether the filing of a dissolution petition triggers a mandatory buyback of the petitioner's shares under the provisions of a right of first refusal… [read post]