Search for: "In re Abel C."
Results 41 - 44
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2008, 7:23 am
The Abel test is based on a trick: the person tested thinks they're evaluating the attractiveness of projected images. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:05 pm
Illustrative is the CCPA's analysis in In re Howard, 55 C.C.P.A. 1121, 394 F.2d 869, 157 USPQ 615 (CCPA 1968), wherein the court affirmed the Board of Appeals' rejection of the claims for lack of novelty and found it unnecessary to reach the Board's section 101 ground that a method of doing business is "inherently unpatentable. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:03 am
James C. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 8:20 am
A "quick and dirty" translation of the reasoning of the Advocate General in the LIMONCHELO dispute, Case C- 344/05 P OHIM v Shaker (see earlier post by the IPKat here), comes from Stéphane Ambrosini (Tomkins & Co, Dublin): "24. [read post]
