Search for: "In re Appeal of H.R."
Results 41 - 60
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 11:25 am
(Interlocutory Appeal; Quiet Title Act) Yazzie v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:37 pm
Smokes for less Smoke Shop (Smoke Shop Licensing)In re Interest of Nery V. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:28 am
The appeals court agreed and the case was sent back down to be re-tried. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:15 am
Courts of Appeals Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/currentcta.htmCases featured:Turner v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 1:51 pm
" Almost no Scope: Many design patent holders run from the Federal Circuit's 1988 in re Mann decision announcing that "design patents have almost no scope. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:57 pm
The SEC’s options are now dwindling, but a rule rewrite or an appeal to the Supreme Court are at least possible. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:42 am
Over the past few days, I have been repeatedly asked to explain my opinion of H.R. 5284, primarily my criticism of the fixed percentage MSA option for claims under $250,000. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:26 am
The 110th saw that happen to H.R. 2549 also, and H.R. 5309 went the same way during the 109th. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
House of Representatives passed the “Laken Riley Act”, H.R. 7511 . [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm
Kills Warrior (Double Jeopardy; Tribal Court Jurisdiction) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2023.html In re RLG (Child Placement; Guardian Ad Litem) Henderson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:22 am
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.htmlMackinac Tribe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:34 pm
Guide for tribal appeals by pro se litigants and lay advocates. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 4:11 am
We’re suckers for vague scary words that don’t actually have any meaning. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 1:59 pm
We’re also so grateful to the lead sponsors of the PAST Act, Reps. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, Case Nos. 12-3169, 12-3182 & 3420. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:44 am
On March 4, 2010, Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), and Ted Kaufman (D-DE) released a statement saying that they’re moving forward on an agreement that, according to the release, “makes changes to first-window post-grant review, inter partes review, willfulness, interlocutory appeals, Patent and Trademark Office funding, and supplemental examinations. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:44 am
On March 4, 2010, Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), and Ted Kaufman (D-DE) released a statement saying that they’re moving forward on an agreement that, according to the release, “makes changes to first-window post-grant review, inter partes review, willfulness, interlocutory appeals, Patent and Trademark Office funding, and supplemental examinations. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm
”AALL also coordinated a letter signed by 15 other organizations advocating for the passage of H.R. 6714 the Electronic Court Records Reform Act, a bipartisan bill which was re-introduced in the US House of Representatives last Wednesday. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:30 pm
Riley (Casinos, Commercial Bribery)In re I.R. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:26 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.html Aguayo v. [read post]
