Search for: "In re Appeal of Visser" Results 41 - 60 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2022, 1:35 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
The panel of judges will consist of Klaus Grabinski, Camille Lignières (legally qualified judge at the UPC local division in Paris), and Patrik Rydman (technically qualified judge). [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:27 am by Magnus Dahlman (Gulliksson)
The judgment After losing in first instance, Abacus appealed to the Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal (case number PMT 8284-20). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:59 am by Francois Pochart
The proceedings for appealing against an opposition decision are based on: civil proceedings before the courts of appeal (in particular representation, appeal for review, successive three-month time limits for exchanging initial submissions, without applying Article 700 of the Code of Civil Proceeding); and the proceeding for appealing against the decisions of the Director General of the French PTO (in particular the one-month appeal period, the exclusive… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:01 am
However, the 3,700+ readers who get their IPKat by email may just need the occasional reminder to visit the blog itself (many readers have not noticed the colour-change and general smartening up, it seems) ...The IPKat thanks his respected and venerable friend Dirk Visser for information concerning a forthcoming reference to the European Court of Justice of a couple of questions emanating from the Brussels Court of Appeal and which concern the SatCab Directive. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:42 am
If nothing else, in a market where suppliers are plentiful and profit margins -- unless you're lucky -- rock bottom, it helps to know how many items to manufacture for your intended market. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
As an auxiliary request, it requestd that the following question be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA): “In which way should the term “pending” in R 25(1) EPC 1973 (now R 36(1) EPC) be interpreted for the case where the parent application has been deemed to be withdrawn but a request for re-establishment of rights was filed and a relevant appeal was pending at the time of filing of the divisional application? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  More appealing to think of modern TM law as: the subject is the TM, searching for consumers. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Among other subjects, the right to strike will be re-discussed in this exercise. [read post]
For 2019-20 they are Fellows of the Innovators Network Foundation More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Overview of the Appeal Proceedings according to the EPC, Third Edition by Hugo Meinders, Philipp Lanz, Gérard Weiss€ 95 … [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:34 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
” Are you concerned German re-ratification will be pushed through parliament? [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 4:26 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
If a request to hold oral proceedings on the premises of the European Patent Office is refused, the applicant will be informed of the reasons; such a refusal is not separately appealable. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
 Later that same day the IPKat's benefactor Dirk Visser furnished a second English translation -- this time of another case that ran on much the same lines but was somewhat more complex. [read post]
 Without expedition, the appeal before the TBA was not expected to be heard until early 2022. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:40 am by Nina Ferara (Porsche AG)
For example, paper M3 may include drafting of third party observations or grounds of appeal. [read post]