Search for: "In re Application of Jones" Results 41 - 60 of 1,063
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2012, 1:12 pm by J. Adam Engel
  See JA Engel, Courts Re-Examine The Application Of Goldfinger era Electronic Tracking Cases To Law Enforcement Use Of GPS Tracking Devices, 14 RICHMOND J. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:12 pm by J. Adam Engel
  See JA Engel, Courts Re-Examine The Application Of Goldfinger era Electronic Tracking Cases To Law Enforcement Use Of GPS Tracking Devices, 14 RICHMOND J. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
Jones Investment Co., 75 USPQ2d 1313 (TTAB 2005) [Applicant's NORTON MCNAUGHTON ESSENTIALS trademark for women's clothing is not confusingly similar to opposer's registered mark ESSENTIALS mark for similar goods]. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 4:58 am
In re Citizens Financial Group, Inc., Serial No. 78451347 (September 26, 2006) [not citable].In Knight Textile [TTABlogged here], the applicant sought to register the mark NORTON MCNAUGHTON ESSENTIALS for various items of ladies sportswear. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:11 am by Kevin
Jones explained that “in business, you don’t want to have a lot of cash in accounts because the state at some point, if you’re going to owe a bill for your hotel, can come in and garnish your account. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 3:19 am
In re Heather Harley and Carolyn Jones, Serial No. 86409857 (August 24, 2016) [precedential].During prosecution, Examining Attorney Jeffrey J. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:41 am by Orin Kerr
Maryland is controlling) 2) In re Application of the United States (D.D.C. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 6:00 pm by Juvan Bonni
Frye: In re Patentability of the Peltzer Inventions (Source: SSRN) Prof. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Callahan's Stay Motion is in Re: Richard Allenv. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:48 pm by Sme
Berryhill (10th Cir., June 13, 2017) (affirming denial of Lopez's fee application under the Equal Access to Justice Act following his successful appeal; the decision appealed from, however, was substantially justified despite its being wrong)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm by Todd Presnell
  The applicants argued, in part, that VW waived the privilege over Jones Day’s investigative documents by disclosing privileged material to the DOJ. [read post]