Search for: "In re Application of Rodgers"
Results 41 - 60
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
(In re Fields), Joe Willie Fields (not to be confused with Joe Willie Namath) filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
(In re Fields), Joe Willie Fields (not to be confused with Joe Willie Namath) filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:38 am
Cir. 2003)(“Other courts of appeals that have considered the application of Rule 11 to attorney-case-citation issues have reached differing results. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:35 am
Petrone, whatever the law lacks in frequency of application, it more than makes up for in confusion. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
§ 362(d)(3)(A), or (ii) commence making monthly payments to the secured creditor from rents or other revenues generated by the project “in an amount equal to interest at the then applicable nondefault rate of interest on the value of the creditor’s interest in the real estate” within the same time periods. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
We’re victims, too! [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
The first is an incorrect application of refugee law doctrine – surprising, because Hathaway’s 1991 book is such an impressive doctrinal analysis. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
At [63]-[64] Lord Rodger stated: “What’s in a name? [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:12 am
If you’re really worried, contact your malpractice carrier and purchase extra coverage. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
Criminal law -- Attempted murder -- Jury instructions -- Giving of standard jury instruction on attempted manslaughter is not fundamental error in prosecution for attempted first degree murder where defendant is convicted of lesser included offense of attempted second degree murder -- Conflict certifiedJEAN L. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:16 pm
Model Anton Pillar Order re: Electronic Documents Finally, it is possible to obtain an Anton Pillar Order in respect of digital information, including social media accounts and physical devices. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm
FAA would be within its authority to re-issue all 130 Determinations with a “No Hazard” finding provided FAA includes further explanation of its conclusions. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:18 am
However, in its conclusion that the UK did have ECHR jurisdiction over the applicants’ relatives the Court actually appears to have conflated exception (2) with exception (1) – state agent authority and control – as follows: …following the removal from power of the Ba’ath regime and until the accession of the Interim Government, the United Kingdom…assumed in Iraq the exercise of some of the public powers normally to be exercised by a sovereign government.… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
CROATIA (Application no. 48833/07): Where an occupier faces loss of their home by action by a public body, it must be possible for the proportionality of the eviction to be considered by an independent tribunal - see Nearly Legal Flinders, R (on the application of) v The Director of High Security & Ors [2011] EWHC 1630 (Admin) (30 June 2011): Murderer who put victim in crucifix shape should have been given oral hearing re prisoner categorisation decision. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Beginning with sad news, Lord Alan Rodger of Earlsferry, one of the justices of the Supreme Court, died yesterday. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
McCaughey & Anor, Re Application for Judicial Review [2011] UKSC 20 (18 May 2011)- Read judgment The Supreme Court has followed the European Court of Human Rights in ruling that an inquest into the death of two people killed before the introduction of the Human Rights Act is still bound by the rules laid down by that Act. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
In Re McCaughey & Anor [2011] UKSC 20 the Supreme Court, Lord Rodger dissenting, accepted the applicability of the Human Rights Act 1998 to the operation of inquests into pre-Human Rights Act killings. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
Comment Aside from the colourful facts, and the detailed guidance on the application of res judicata in civil proceedings, the case is notable for the divergence of opinion between the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court in respect of public interest as a ground for allowing or dismissing the appeal on a technicality. [read post]
