Search for: "In re Bartlett" Results 41 - 60 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2007, 6:19 pm
With New York's Simpson Thacher & Bartlett pushing first-year base pay to $160,000 -- and seventh years to $265,000 -- will other California-based firms be forced to follow suit? [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:59 am
            So we read the decision in In re: Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation (Gannon), No. 3:13-cv-10143-DRH-PMF, 2014 U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 5:10 pm
Commenting on my Bruce Bartlett post, Anonymous asks: Can you recommend a book on Keynesian economics suitable for an adult with a financial services background and an MBA? [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
  We’ve also noticed that, in the two years since Bartlett added the most significant piece to this puzzle, there’s hardly any case law on point – only one decision, In re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 10:20 am by Bexis
The recent decision in In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 2013 WL 4306434 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
Thanks to Terry Henryat Blank Rome for sending along today’s preemption decision in In re Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products Liability Litigation (No. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:45 am by Elie Mystal
But here we are, in the fourth quarter of 2010, and a new NALP report is telling us top Biglaw salaries in New York have re-established themselves at $160K. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:29 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Opportunities aren't infinite, indeed sometimes they're scarcely even finite. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 2:29 am
"This overlaps with but is also partly distinct from (and a complement rather than an alternative to) Bruce Bartlett's explanation, noted by me here, of why the U.S. is likely to default. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:32 am
"It's an internal memo, we're not a public company," he says. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 9:07 pm by Buce
  And by the way, if you expect those guys to thank you for what you're doing, you better think again. [read post]