Search for: "In re Brown (1971)" Results 41 - 60 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2018, 7:54 am by Berry Law Firm
  New and material evidence concerning the matter can re-open the claim, with the new “effective date” being the date of the re-opening filing for benefits. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:05 am by SHG
Across the country, local efforts are at last underway to integrate schools that remain profoundly segregated more than half a century after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 10:13 am by Tim Hewson
A bequest can be a sum of money “$1,000 to my niece Susan Brown ”, an object “my 1971 Ford Mustang to my brother Gary White”, or a percentage of your estate “one percent of my estate to the Toronto Humane Society”. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Julian Ouellet
Thus the importance of re-opening communication is very high in other conflicts as well.Third parties are often effective at reestablishing channels of communication — they may in fact become THE channel of communication between parties exploring conciliation. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Julian Ouellet
Thus the importance of re-opening communication is very high in other conflicts as well.Third parties are often effective at reestablishing channels of communication — they may in fact become THE channel of communication between parties exploring conciliation. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am by Victoria Kwan
The next day, he discussed the Constitution and Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:25 pm by Calvin TerBeek
By the time Bork delivered his lecture in 1971, racial mores were shifting and Brown's status as part of the canon had begun to solidy. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the 1975 Ontario judgment Re Brown, (1975), 9 O.R. (2d) 185 at 192 (Ont. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 11:55 am by Eugene Volokh
First, the facts: On July 1, 2016, California Governor Jerry Brown signed several gun control bills into law. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
In February 2015, the Federal Circuit gave its first deep consideration to these statutes in In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC.[2] The IPR petition against Cuozzo’s patent had applied reference A to claim 10, and references A, B, and C to claim 17 (which depended from claim 10). [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:04 pm by Michael Grossman
Many social and psychological experiments have been conducted to investigate this assertion, including the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment of 1971 (it’s Google-worthy if you have a few minutes to spare). [read post]