Search for: "In re Faith B."
Results 41 - 60
of 2,220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 2:24 pm
. 信任 [(xìnrèn) Trust; Faith; Credibility]. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
We’re on the cusp of [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:23 am
” In re Estate of Pellico, 916 NE 2d 45 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2009 “The fact that a party appears pro se does not relieve that party from complying as nearly as possible to the Illinois Supreme Court Rules for practice before this court” Voris v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 7:24 am
Upon request by Plaintiffs within 30 days of the re-release described in Paragraph 2 above, ICE will also make available under that header the document re-released as 2023-ICLI-00011_704. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm
Mass. 1-11-24) (complaint) (1) As in previous complaints related to university antisemitism, I find that the strongest claims are that (a) the university refuses to enforce its own, content-neutral, rules (In this context, for example, I can't see any legitimate reason for HLS to allow pro-Hamas students to take over Casperson lounge); and (b) the university reacts quite differently to complaints of antisemitism than it does to complaints of other sorts of bias, resulting in… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Amy Coney Barrett, Substantive Canons and Faithful Agency, 90 B.U. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:08 am
Republicans have criticized the memo for months.But the memo was withdrawn and the nation’s top law enforcement officials have repeatedly denounced it....We're told Attorney General Merrick B. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 4:16 am
The same year, the applicant, Full Colour, filed a request for a declaration of invalidity for all relevant goods and services on grounds of bad faith under Article 59(1)(b) EUTMR and also pursuant to Article 59(1)(a) EUTMR in connection with Article 7(1)(b) and (c) EUTMR.The parties’ argumentsThe applicant submitted, amongst other things, that the mark for which protection was obtained was identical to EUTM No 12 575 155 (that is: the registration at issue in the… [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:33 am
§ 1115(b)(4) (creating a defense to infringement where the ‘term or device … is descriptive of and used fairly and in good faith only to describe the goods and services of such party’). [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
Olówa Aiyere, Agiri Ilé-Ilógbón; Olúwa mi; amoimotán, A kò mo O tàn kose, A ba mo tàn kose, A bà mo tán ìbà se ke. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:08 pm
RCW 26.09.160(2)(b). [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:06 am
He used the following negative prompts:(3d, render, cg, painting, drawing, cartoon, anime, comic: 1.2), bad anatomy, ad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer di gits, cropped, worst quality, signature, watermark, username, blurry, artist name, (long body) , bad anatomy, liquid body, ma formed, mutated, badproportions, uncoordinated body, unnaturalbody, disfigured, ugly, gross proportions, mutation, disfigured, deformed, (mutation), (child: 1.2) , b&w, fat, extra… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:32 am
Lovington’s proposals were not made in good faith, they were a naked attempt to run up discovery costs by forcing us to re-run the AI’s analysis … Ms. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
Tabs Motors of Valley Stream Corp., No. 160529/2019 (NY County 2021) (discussed here), New York County Justice Reed enforced the buy-sell provision of a shareholders’ agreement in 2021 at a value set forth on “Schedule B” that was last updated in 2012. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In In re Solera Holdings, Inc. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:56 am
“We do not see any contradiction between the fight against terrorism and the protection of civilians,” Nicolas de Rivière said. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
”(B) Service by e-mail. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
O’Connor ran for the seat in her own right in 1970; she won and was re-elected again in 1972. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
”As a result, the Court of Appeal had to re-assess the originality of the GUIs at issue by applying the correct test. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:32 pm
” Statements to distributors: First, did Rule 9(b) apply? [read post]
