Search for: "In re Foss"
Results 41 - 60
of 258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 5:39 am
Their historical ties with the UK don't mean that they're necessarily going to agree with the CMA. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:21 am
Follow @FOSSpatents on Twitter Follow FOSS Patents on LinkedInLinkedIn is the recommended platform if you prefer [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 11:27 am
The problem of no clear rules for re-registration of a temporarily-removed patent is serious. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
At the very end, if they were to have standing and to prove harm, there would be the question of whether they're entitled to an injunction. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:44 am
Earlier today, an Apple lobbyist expressed concern over ETSI's letter to the Commission: From: ETSIBOARD: Board distribution list ETSIBOARD[REDACTED] on behalf of Helene Workman [REDACTED]@APPLE.COMDate: Monday, 17 April 2023 at 04:02To: ETSIBOARD@[REEDACTED]Subject: Re: Draft EU SEP regulation - ETSI letter to the European CommissionDear Luis and colleagues,I am very surprised and concerned to see this letter to these EC Cabinets stating that the letter provides ETSI’s views on… [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 2:56 am
The European Commission's U-turn on standard-essential patent (SEP) pools is remarkable and apparently attributable to lobbying by certain parties, facilitated by DG GROW's mistake of relying on an adviser whose business benefits from complex licensing processes entailing many bilateral negotiations (and disputes). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:58 am
One would normally assume that when the executive branch of the government of the world's third-largest economy endeavors to regulate the enforcement of standard-essential patents (SEPs), it would--at minimum--come up with a proper definition of those key terms. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:37 am
We're talking about legitimate innovators. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:09 am
They're successful in Asia and even beyond, but not really big in Europe. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 1:58 am
They lacked standing because the plaintiffs may be able to claim that they play games, but not that they're gamne industry employees. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 12:35 am
For the first 18 months, patent applications are in "stealth mode": they're in the database, but not publicly available. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:56 pm
Class-action lawyers tend to be persistent even when they're losing. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Coincidentally, today is the cutoff date for fact discovery in two disparate antitrust actions involving Activision Blizzard King (ABK): the FTC's adjudicative proceeding (in-house lawsuit) over ABK's acquisition by Microsoft, andthe In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation in the Northern District of California, where Epic Games and Match Group are pursuing a per se violation claim against Google based on its "Project Hug" agreements with game makers. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:30 am
The relevant statute says this (just skip it if you're not interested or already know it): "The petitioner in an inter partes review of a claim in a patent under this chapter that results in a final written decision under section 318(a), or the real party in interest or privy of the petitioner, may not assert either in a civil action arising in whole or in part under section 1338 of title 28 or in a proceeding before the International Trade Commission under section 337 of the… [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
I can see why one would not want the evaluators to be influenced while they're doing their work. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 1:02 am
Now, imagine you're an implementer, such as an IoT startup. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Here's the unredacted document with lots of exhibits:In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:21-md-2981-JD): Unredacted Version of PLaintiffs' Supplemental Brief on Google's Chat ProductionFollow @FOSSpatents on Twitter Follow FOSS Patents on LinkedInLinkedIn is the recommended platform if you prefer to focus on patent topics, while @FOSSpatents increasingly tweets about antitrust.Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 12:54 am
Yesterday the UK Competition & Markets Authority (CMA) announced an update to its provisional findings relating to Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard King. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 10:48 pm
They're probably a lot more consistent. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am
Cal.): Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief on Google's Chat ProductionGoogle was also ordered to make a statement, and unsurprisingly Google continues to deny any wrongdoing or prejudice:In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:21-md-02981-JD, N.D. [read post]
