Search for: "In re Garcia on Admission"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm
Garcia passed the California State Bar Exam but his admission to practice has been held up pending a moral character determination since he disclosed that he’s an undocumented immigrant. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
In light several key court of appeals decisions prior to Dukes (including the Second Circuit in In re IPO Securities Litigation, the Third Circuit in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, and even the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Dukes itself), this analytical model is not groundbreaking, but Dukes puts an end to any possible reluctance by the federal courts to resolve an issue of fact simply because it might overlap with the merits. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 10:49 pm
Garcia-Lopez Once you understand the reasoning behind Aragon, you're probably not surprised that Garcia-Lopez wasn't denied benefits on the basis of his illegal status. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 10:49 pm
Garcia-Lopez Once you understand the reasoning behind Aragon, you're probably not surprised that Garcia-Lopez wasn't denied benefits on the basis of his illegal status. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:03 pm
Several years ago in Arizona, for example, the case of In re: James Joseph Hamm resulted in denying James Hamm, a candidate for bar admission, a license to practice in Arizona. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” In re Tyrone Noling, 2011 U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:35 pm
., a North Carolina lawyer, was suspended for five years due to his admission of misconduct regarding the sexual harassment of his staff. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 1:36 pm
Garcia, 923 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (holding that trial court is required to afford State sufficient opportunity to present evidence on defendant's qualification as prison release reoffender)For all you prosecutors who read the blog and send me endless emails complaining that I never call out a judge who makes mistakes and prejudices the prosecution, here's proof you're wrong. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Shabazz, No. 08-2145 Conviction and sentence for violations of the Hobbs Act and firearms possession is affirmed where: 1) the district court erred in initially denying the jury's request to read back testimony, but the error was cured when the court reversed itself and gave the jury the option of reading the testimony; 2) even if the the district court erred in admitting a statement defendant made to a detective, defendant would still not be entitled to a new trial as admission of the… [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 1:30 am
., plaintiff-appellee
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice
Defendant's Non-Verbal Admission Provides Reasonable Cause to Believe He Stole Watches
People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:52 am
DavisInsufficient evidence of rape of unconscious personImproper admission of prior bad acts evidenceMarch 24-Tuesday-p.m.State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
(Subscribe first, then RSVP for free admission). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Garcia, the statute of limitations apply with equal force to section 1983 method-of-execution action; 2) the limitations period begins to accrue on the date direct review of a plaintiff's conviction and sentence is complete; 3) the district court correctly found that the statute of limitations has run for each of the three remaining plaintiffs; and 4) there was no reason to hold that the statute of limitations has been tolled. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Garcia-Ruiz, No. 07-51269 Conviction for reentry into the U.S. as a deported alien is affirmed over an objection that police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant, where defendant had mooted the issue by stipulating to facts establishing all the elements of the charged crime. .. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Garcia-Alvarez, No. 071471, 071697 Conviction for carjacking and firearms offenses is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence proffered against defendant was not sufficient; and 2) the district court erred in denying defendant's motion for a new trial. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
In re Cases Filed by Recording Companies, W.D. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Williams, No. 06-3620 Conviction for armed robbery and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence is affirmed where the district judge did not err in ruling that the testimony of eyewitnesses would be admissible at trial since a lineup in which the eyewitnesses identified the defendant was not flawed in any way that would lead to irreparable misidentification. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Ramos-Cardenas, No. 06-51383 Defendants' convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the sufficiency of the evidence; 2) whether some defendants' Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights were violated by admission of the post-arrest statements given by two codefendants, even though a limiting instruction was given to the jury; and 3) whether the… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Garcia, No. 07-40245 A conviction for drug-related offenses is reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) during rebuttal closing argument, the government improperly bolstered its key witnesses, the agents who heard defendant's unrecorded confession; and 2) such bolstering constituted reversible plain error, which seriously affected the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of the proceedings. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
" U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 05, 2008 Garcia-Meza v. [read post]
