Search for: "In re Hough"
Results 41 - 49
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 5:14 am
The opinion we’re concerned with is the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:59 am
A more cerebral discussion is offered by Brian Buetler: [T]hough it's easy to place too much emphasis on this particular episode, and that doing so only makes it harder for the White House and Treasury to address the problem--there is an underlying issue here that matters quite a bit. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 11:16 am
"We're working in an environment where the acceptable failure rate is zero," he said. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:21 pm
Cir. 1998) (quoting In re Bergy, 596 F.2d 952, 960 (CCPA 1979)). [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 7:37 pm
"When you're down, it is really hard to get up. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 2:10 pm
"When you're down, it is really hard to get up. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:59 am
We’re in a dynamic situation here. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:01 pm
"Because of the issues surrounding (that) privilege, right now we're not able to explain why there were mistakes that occurred in the litigation," said Qualcomm spokeswoman Christine Trimble. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 5:35 am
Some of those couples may have reconciled, but Juhas suspects that many more are stuck or may even think they are divorced when they are not.Bonnie Hough is supervising attorney for the Center for Families, Children and the Courts, a division of the state Judicial Council's Administrative Office of the Courts. [read post]
