Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2" Results 41 - 60 of 1,917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm by Jamie Markham
Sex offenders who aren’t required to register for life can petition for removal from the registry 10 years from the date of initial county registration. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
The FCC, in turn, has put the petition out for public comment (Docket RM-11862), with the initial comment submission period ending September 2. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am by Mary Dwyer
International Trade Commission12-552Issue: Whether the initial authorized sale outside the United States of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 10:18 pm
The next day, the Hixsons appealed: (1) the September dismissal of their adoption petition; (2) the December ruling that severed the adoption petitions and struck their response to the Bakers’ petition. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 11:19 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The court must grant 180-day extension(s) upon re-certification by the State Department (again on petition of the DOJ), which leaves open the possibility of very long-term stays (the italics are mine). [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
No. 07-5439, April 16, 2008) ..................................... 2, 10 Bryan v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 6:23 am
(In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation), 471 F.3d 24 (2d Cir.2006). [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
I assume that DOD will propose legislation to clearly preclude military appellate courts from exercising jurisdiction over cases after the later of conclusion of direct appeal or the closing of the two-year window for petitions for new trial.2. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 8:25 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Upon the appellant's petition for review pursuant to Article 112a EPC, the Enlarged Board of Appeal set aside decision T 1627/09 and ordered the proceedings before the Board 3.3.08 to be re-opened (decision R 2/14 of 22 April 2016).IV. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:44 pm
She cited a practice direction from the Chief Justice as follows:2. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 8:40 am by Nate Nieman
Throughout these hearings, Attorney 2, who had been initially appointed to represent the mother, was now appointed to represent the father, and the mother was now represented by appointed counsel Attorneys 4 and 5. [read post]