Search for: "In re J. J."
Results 41 - 60
of 17,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2012, 9:56 am
The following is an email exchange between J. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
In general, a mistake or ignorance of the law is an insufficient ground for re-establishment: see J 5/94 [3.1], J 27/01 [3.3.1], J 2/02 [8] and J 6/07 [2.4-5]. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Willard Hurst Prize and Herbert Jacob Book Prize.About the J. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 11:06 am
As a reminder, all proceeds from the silent auction go to help fund the Marla J. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 10:52 pm
Il y en a maintenant plus de 180 qui ont été publiés, et malgré plusieurs changements professionnels, j’essaie de continuer à vous fournir régulièrement un contenu que j’espère de qualité. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 3:11 am
Friend-of-the-blog, MEET THE BLOGGERS sponsor, and First Amendment expert Marc J. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:10 am
J. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This request was ultimately denied by the Legal Board of Appeal (decision J 1/11), essentially because by the time the request for correction had been filed notice of the withdrawal had already been recorded in the European Patent Register (on February 6, 2009). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
If a request for re-establishment is based on an isolated mistake the appellant must plausibly show that there was a normally satisfactory system established at the relevant time in the office in question (Case Law, 6th edition 2010, VI.E.7.3.3 a), J 13/07 [5.1]). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:45 pm
Sellers, J. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 7:04 pm
Now, our client can re-file an adjustment of status application (I-485) for her green card with the approved I-140 petition and I-612 waiver. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
J 19/05 [4]) [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:23 am
The post DAVID J. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:08 pm
By not doing so, it has violated its duty of clarification (Aufklärungspflicht). [10]The Board then discusses decisions J 15/92 (where re-establishment was granted on the basis of the principle of good faith), J 34/92, J 6/90, and J 6/98 (where re-establishment was refused on the basis of legal security). [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:00 am
"We're very happy to have Attorney Matherne back. [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:00 am
"We're very happy to have Attorney Matherne back. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 3:36 pm
However, in the 26 years since the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 was passed, we have seen endless tinkering, involving over 70 separate amending instruments; even the so-called major reviews, by Gowers and most recently Hargreaves, did not fully explore the impact of specific changes which were advocated on the copyright system as a whole.Arnold J also called for a re-think of our approach to copyright law reform - in essence a return to the measured analysis by a… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:54 pm
J&J needs to be accountable for all the damage it has caused. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
However, the game was re-released under the name DMCA’s Sky. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
Under the principles laid down in the decisions T 14/89 and J 13/90, there is a legitimate expectation on the part of the applicant that the EPO should draw to the applicant’s attention deficiencies in a request for re-establishment of rights which are obviously easy to correct. [read post]
