Search for: "In re James C."
Results 41 - 60
of 1,669
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm
” They’re right. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
We’re on the cusp of [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:35 am
In re James Lindsay, Serial No. 90793706 (January 8, 2034) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Session 3: Federalism John C. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Jackson Distinguished University Professor, University of Rochester), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
In re Oliver (1948). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
That conception included a republican reading of legal history (based on a controversial but exciting reading of the works of James Madison and Thomas Jefferson), and a deliberative conception of democracy (like the one advanced by Jurgen Habermas or Jon Elster). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
Saftler and Bacher PLLC, Schedule A In 2014, Lawrence Saftler and James Bacher formed Saftler & Bacher, PLLC, a law firm focused on plaintiffs’-side personal injury litigation. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Walsh, Res Iusta, Jurisdiction, and Judgment as Everyday Aspects of Thomistic Juridical Realism, (The Concept of Ius in Thomas Aquinas (Loïc-Marie Le Bot & Petar Popovic, eds.) [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Air Force C-17 to Egypt [were] subsequently transported via ground into Gaza and then distributed by U.N. agencies. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
The UK expressed reserved support for Israel’s actions at the outset, with then-Foreign Secretary James Cleverely calling for “restraint and discipline” in the military response to Hamas. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
* * * C. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Notre Dame Law Review] On Monday, I started serial-blogging my article, The Myth of the Federal Private Nondelegation Doctrine, which has just come out in the Notre Dame Law Review. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:03 am
And we’re going to keep working on this, as I said, hour by hour with all our partners in the region. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:02 am
§ 16-14-4(c). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
" Many separation-of-powers doctrines can be thought of as recipient-based nondelegation doctrines (though they're often not presented with the "delegation" label): Congress can't delegate significant federal authority to someone, unless that someone is appointed according to the rules governing officers of the United States (i.e., the Appointments Clause) and is properly removable. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:41 am
Yours sincerely, Brett Solomon, Executive Director, Access Now Ahmed Samih Farag, General Director, Andalus Institute for Tolerance and Anti-Violence Studies Quinn McKew, Executive Director, ARTICLE 19 Bahey eldin Hassan, Director, Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS) Jodie Ginsberg, President, Committee to Protect Journalists Sayed Nasr, Executive Director, EgyptWide for Human Rights Ahmed Attalla, Executive Director, Egyptian Front for Human Rights Samar Elhusseiny, Programs Officer,… [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Ashford,Nachman Brautbar,*David C. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Current confusion doctrine is very different in many ways, two of the most important being, first, that there is no materiality requirement—consumers need not care at all about the thing they’re supposedly confused about, and that itself makes confusion easier to find because people aren’t careful about things they don’t care about. [read post]
