Search for: "In re Jonathan H."
Results 41 - 60
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2023, 7:07 am
Hall, H. (2021, June 29). [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:10 pm
Judge Wiener's relatively brief opinion begins: On January 20, 2021, the Biden Administration issued an executive order that re-established an interagency working group ("Working Group") to formulate guidance on the "social cost of greenhouse gases. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:02 am
The film also stars Ryan Phillippe as the accused, as well as Marisa Tomei William H. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:40 pm
And all of a sudden you're telling us that, no, you can't vacate it, you do something different. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm
And all of a sudden you’re telling us that, no, you can’t vacate it, you do something different. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Although I am not a Jew, I am, following Jonathan Miller, “Jew-ish, just not the whole hog. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:21 am
(The Court also issued a one-line per curiam in In re Grand Jury, dismissing that case as improvidently granted.) [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 8:09 am
This morning the Court also DIGged a case (as in, Dismissed as Improvidently Granted): In re Grand Jury, which concerned the extent to which attorney client privilege applies to communications containing both legal and non-legal advice. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:30 pm
He paused for a long time, and then said, "I would think, as I do with Jonathan, that's a smart person, you're doing a smart thing. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:44 am
We're tempted to think that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:14 pm
" In re $67,470, 901 F.2d 1540, 1544 (11th Cir. 1990); see also Hunsucker, 497 F.2d at 32. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 3:21 pm
GENERAL PRELOGAR: But also never with attention to the remedial arguments that we're making here, and I—I don't think it's ever too late for this Court to give the statute its proper construction when you actually look at its text, context, and history. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:27 pm
For all that handwringing, we're right back where we started: "Images" means exactly what you'll find in every dictionary—a "still representation"; and vis-à-vis a video, an "image" is a "frame. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:22 am
As I explained in a blog post at the time, part of what made the process work was that Governor Kasich made clear what he wanted—a highly qualified jurist with a conservative judicial philosophy matching that of the governor (and who would be a viable candidate for re-election)—and let us evaluate the applicants on his behalf, free of political influence or meddling. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 11:30 am
June 1, 2020); see also In re Stout, 231 B.R. 313, 316–17 (Bankr. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm
This sort of re-purposing of regulatory authority—pouring new wine out of old bottles—was something the Court would not allow in NFIB v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Chris Walker had the great idea to assemble a bibliography on the major questions doctrine (MQD) so that we can have a one-stop shop for all things MQD. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 3:37 pm
And so, he would prefer to just be called "judge": [I]f we're going to use titles and names to carry out these official duties, then "Judge" seems like the least risky option. [read post]
