Search for: "In re Kennard" Results 41 - 60 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2009, 10:53 am by Walsh & Walsh, P.C.
The majority opinion, 5-2 with Justices Kennard and George joining the three dissenters (Baxter, Chin and Corrigan) from In re Marriage Cases, is 136 pages long. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Justice Kennard asked petitioner to clarify exactly what she wanted the ruling to be any why? [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 11:46 pm
Justices Appear Likely to Uphold Ban on Gay Marriage The Recorder During oral arguments Thursday, California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George and Justice Joyce Kennard, who helped form the 4-3 majority that let same-sex couples wed for six months last year, gave all indications that Proposition 8 -- the measure that took that right away -- must be accepted as the will of the people. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:14 pm
She and George repeatedly emphasized that the other protections afforded gays by Marriage Cases will remain, with Kennard going so far as to ask Shannon Minter, of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, why he felt that "the sky has fallen in. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in In re Tobacco II Cases, no. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
" In my mind, to use an analogy different from that used by Justice Kennard, it's similar to Merrell Dow in the civil context. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:39 am
The majority (led by Justice Corrigan) and dissent (authored by Justice Kennard) disagree on whether there's constitutional or prejudicial error. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:30 am
Come on.For this reason, I'm somewhat sympathetic to Justice Kennard's dissent. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 9:25 pm
  Justice Kennard was part of the 4-3 majority in the Marriage Cases decision from May 15, and I was concerned that without her vote it would be difficult to prevail here. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 7:21 pm
It's a 4-3, with George, Kennard, Werdegar, and Moreno on top. [read post]
15 May 2008, 1:12 pm
decision entitled “In re Marriage Cases” represented a consolidated appeal from 6 cases. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 6:10 am
  Pursuant to such a ruling, the legislature could quickly re-enact the marriage bill and the governor could sign it, and we would be done with the issue -- unless the ballot measure wins enough valid signatures and we need to go through an initiative battle in the fall. [read post]