Search for: "In re LR " Results 41 - 60 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 10:44 am
by Tim Coomer, Specific Software True confession time: we're a bunch of nerds here at WorkCompEdge.com, Specific Software Solutions, and SIGMA Actuarial Consulting Group. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:18 am by Donald Dinnie
  The insurer relied on a 1995 judgment of Mahli v Abbey Life Insurance [1995] 4 Re LR 305 as authority for the legal proposition that something cannot be said to be known to an underwriter if that something requires the aggregate of multiple facts known by different people within the insurance organisation. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 8:43 am
Stanley Fish, one proponent, in a review of Barak's book forthcoming in the Cardozo LR, lists the membership as him, me, Steve Smith, Paul Campos, Sai, Walter Benn Michaels, and Steven Knapp. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Jordan Bierkos
In the 2021 case of Young EnergyServe Inc v LR Ltd,[11]LR Processing Partnership,Young EnergyServe Inc v LR Ltd, LR Processing Partnership, 2021 ABQB 101 (“Young EnergyServe”). [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:32 pm
In a companion article,* I argued that states should re-conceive and restructure punitive damages to advance, in part, the public's interest in retributive justice. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am by Paul Cartwright
Quoting from both Lord Arbinger v Ashton [(1873) LR Eq 358 at 374] and Schneider NO and Others v AA and Another [2010 (5) SA 203 (WCC) at 211], the court re-iterated the position that, whilst there is no doubt some natural leaning on the part of an expert towards their paymasters, this does not in any way absolve the expert of the duty of impartiality and integrity. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:44 am by Dan Markel
In any event, I figured some of you may enjoy knowing what I've found really good or helpful to me recently, but I should note that I won't be offering explanations of why I think they're good. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm by Simon Gibbs
The pre-CPR working rule to be found in the judgment of Nourse LJ in Re Elgindata Ltd (No 2) 1 WLR 1207 was modified by the observations of Woolf Lord in AEI Rediffusion Music Ltd v Phonographic Performance Ltd to the effect that it is no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly to be deprived of his costs on a particular issue on which he has failed. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:35 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Removal of the “Revenue Nature” Test for an Exemption At present the Listing Rules provide that transactions “of a revenue nature in the ordinary course of business” are excluded from the scope of LR 10 and 11. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:22 am by Peter Conti-Brown
Second, I'm wondering if it's time for some more in-depth re-assessment of what blogs are doing (if anything) to legal scholarship. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:11 am by SHG
Six said that they reported RMP, six reported RMNE, while two said they reported LR. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
On that footing, it would in my opinion have been essential to stay the English proceedings so that the decision of the EPO would not be rendered nugatory by the operation of the law of res judicata. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:01 am
Currently, the guidance (given in Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc [2008] Bus LR 888) is that a stay should be granted, unless it appears that "the evidence is that some commercial certainty would be achieved at a considerably earlier date in the case of the UK proceedings than in the EPO". [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:10 am by Dan Markel
At best, they're a preview or a trailer of the real thing. [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm by Adeline Chong
The Court noted the difficulty in applying requirement (b) to a foreign judgment because the principle of conclusiveness (Godard v Gray (1870) LR 6 QB 139) prohibits re-opening the merits of the foreign decision (note that this is potentially challenged above but only in respect of Singapore law matters). [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
However, to date no unifying test has been identified for determining when concurrent personal liability will be imposed for corporate torts: Hall v Stewart, 2019 ABCA 98 at para. 18, 82 Alta LR (6th) 233, citing Hogarth v Rocky Mountain Slate Inc., 2013 ABCA 57 at paras. 112-3, 75 Alta LR (5th) 295, 542 AR 289; S. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]