Search for: "In re Magnuson"
Results 41 - 60
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2019, 2:08 pm
In re Dicamba Herbicides Litig., MDL No. 2820, 2019 WL 460500 (E.D. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
We’re lending the FTC a hand in giving those manufacturers a fright—by re-opening our #VoidIfRemoved contest. . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:46 am
Magnuson. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:00 am
Open up your iPhones, peel off the stickers on your video game consoles, and know that you're covered. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
Regner, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 Tags: Agency costs, Appraisal rights, deal, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fair values, Firm valuation, In re Appraisal of Dell, In re Appraisal of DFC Global, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits, Target firms The Investor View on Executive Compensation in 2018 Posted by Chris Wightman and David Martin, CamberView Partners LLC,… [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article for Bloomberg BNA, Hunton & Williams attorneys Andrew J. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:30 pm
” And they’re deadly serious. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 8:36 am
., “what’s said is deceptive, very deceptive in fact...It’s still hogwash though and deceptive...because what you’re really doing is selling younger whisky while pretending it’s older. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recently released paper, Robert W. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:59 am
In re 5-hour ENERGY Marketing & Sales Practices Litig., No. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
In re: Hulu Privacy Litigation, — F. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
For contractors who often subject to one or more of federal environmental laws or regulations, below is a brief report on some the significant environmental law and administrative cases decided since late June of 2015 by jurisdiction: District of Columbia Energy Future Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:14 pm
Privity doesn’t exist in the prescription medical product realm, so the Dixon reasoning should eliminate such actions in such cases in New York.There are other aspects of Dixon – express warranty (pp. 5-7), third-party beneficiary (pp. 10-12), Magnuson-Moss (p. 12), and consumer protection (pp. 13-17) – but they’re not very pertinent to drug/device litigation.We’d like to thank Jeff Yeatman of DLA Piper for sending Dixon to us. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:03 am
It's the first decision that we're aware of in which a 3D printed medical device (or any 3D printed product) has been the subject of litigation that involves product liability principles. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
In re Provine, 312 S.W.3d 824, 828–29 (Tex. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
In re Provine, 312 S.W.3d 824, 828–29 (Tex. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
Technically speaking, it should be the Magnuson-Moss-Moss Act since the bill was sponsored by Senator Warren Magnuson of Washington, Congressman John Moss of California, and Senator Frank Moss of Utah. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Plaintiffs still had their federal claims under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, but the district court was equally direct in disposing of those claims, too. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
In re Milo’s Dog Treats Consolidated Cases, 9 F.Supp.3d 523 (W.D. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
In re Frito-Lay North America, Inc. [read post]
