Search for: "In re Mark L. (1983)" Results 41 - 60 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
” Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It wasn’t until Bill C-34 was re-introduced as Bill C-2 (39-1) in 2007 that the Federal Accountability Act, and the Conflict of Interest Act the following year, turned these principles were turned into statute. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
See, e.g., In re Council on Certification of Nurse Anesthetists, 85 U.S.P.Q.2d 1403 (T.T.A.B. 2007) (affirming refusal to register merely descriptive certification mark on the ground that it had not acquired distinctiveness); In re Nat’l Ass’n of Legal Secretaries (Int’l), 221 U.S.P.Q. 50, 52 (T.T.A.B. 1983) (certification marks subject to “the Section 2 qualifications and bans, including those of Section… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
See, e.g., In re Brown Jordan Co., 219 USPQ 375 (TTAB 1983) (holding that stamping the mark after purchase of the goods, on a tag attached to the goods that are later transported in commerce, is sufficient use). [read post]