Search for: "In re Marriage of Read (2002)"
Results 41 - 60
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
ACLU/SC represented several same-sex couples and organizations in In re Marriage Cases, in which the California Supreme Court held that California’s pre-Proposition 8 statutory definition of marriage as the union of a man and a woman violated the State Constitution. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:42 am
Other authorities cited by the Chancellor included [11] to [14]: Re St Laurence, Scalby [2019] ECC Yor 3; Re St Mary, Great Chart [2022] ECC Can 2; Re Christ Church, Harwood [2002] 1 WLR. 2055; and Re St Denys, Stanford in the Vale [2019] ECC Oxf 1. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:01 am
It is sometimes used for consolidated cases, as with In re Marriage Cases. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:43 am
ERISA lawyers should read the opinion 2016, opinion from the Houston Division, Southern District of Texas. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 pm
In short, I agree with the Judge that a tenant with a shared ownership lease “granted for a term of years certain exceeding 21 years” has a “long lease” within the meaning of section 76 of the 2002 Act regardless of whether the tenant has a 100% interest and, hence, that every shared ownership tenant in Block A is a “qualifying tenant” for the purposes of the 2002 Act. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Is that then res judicata with respect to the other? [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 4:13 am
Many Provinces continue to affirm that same gender marriage is not permissible. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
(In re Marriage of Brown & Yanna (2006) 37 Cal.4th 947, 956.) [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:51 am
In this case, our client entered the United States in 2002. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 5:45 am
You can read it here). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:42 am
(In re Marriage of de Guigne (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 1353, 1361.) [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 2:20 pm
” In re Marriage of Roney, 773 NE 2d 213 – Ill: Appellate Court, 4th Dist. 2002 In Illinois, a divorce suit may be dismissed outright because of the invocation of the fifth amendment. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 5:03 pm
When Harris asked that same question in 2002, 28% said so. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 6:43 am
Here are today's must-reads: 1. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:03 am
In Re Marriage of England v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am
Although errors such as these did not neatly fall within the “relevant factors” outlined in [36] in Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] Fam 299, they satisfied the general requirement that “special circumstances […] which justify the making of an exception from the norm that Christian burial” [35]. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 1:45 pm
Moreover, the Upper Tribunal draws explicit parallels between s.76 CLRA 2002 and section 7 Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, as being substantially the same wording. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 3:37 am
Hodges upholding same-sex marriage as a constitutional right, and before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission officially took the position in Baldwin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 12:33 pm
In re Marriage of Kreiger & Walker The trial court had set child support at the advisory amount. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
It's short and a really engaging read (there's also a play and a very slow movie from the 1970's).Pat Bell: for History of American Legal Education: The Paper ChasePeter Candy (@Pete_Candy): On the Augustan marriage legislation, I've used Graves' 'I, Claudius'. [read post]
