Search for: "In re Michael R. (1992)" Results 41 - 60 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
It is with this backdrop that a recent paper written by Michael Geist and published by the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), The Unintended Equustek Effect: How one case set a precedent for Canadian courts’ growing jurisdiction over internet activities, needs to be critically assessed. [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Therefore, while the appeals court judges in Naruto urged the re-examination of the determination that nonhuman animals can have Article III standing in some future en banc or Supreme Court case, they accepted it for purposes of deciding the case before them.Next came the question whether PETA had so-called “next friend” standing to represent Naruto. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:54 am
Glithero is being re-appointed as a puisne judge of the Superior Court in Simcoe. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
I quote below the body of the argument in the brief, minus the footnotes; but if you’re interested in the issue, you might just want to read the PDF. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
It is clear that lean start-ups are not feasible in the Biotech or Pharmacy industries, where extensive and expensive R&D are essential. [read post]