Search for: "In re N.C" Results 41 - 60 of 1,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
  If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm by Jacquelyn Greene
The Bulletin describes these cases, culminating with In re D.L.D, 203 N.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Scott McKeown
As to the viability of the PREVAIL Act as a stand-alone bill, it is a re-packaged version of the so-called STRONGER Patents Act of 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Scott McKeown
As to the viability of the PREVAIL ACT as a stand-alone bill, it is a re-packaged version of the so-called STRONGER Patents Act of 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:49 am by Unknown
“With this re-opening, it is clear that the Committee’s initial concerns were valid,” they said. [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:01 am
That sounds like something done by a character you're not supposed to like in a very old movie. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:10 am by Phil Dixon
App. 452 (1991) (loudly talking in class after being told to stop, causing a disruption of teaching, was not a substantial disruption)   In re: Brown, 150 N.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Charlotte, N.C. police officer shouts at man, reported to be armed but not holding a weapon, to drop his gun. [read post]