Search for: "In re O.R." Results 41 - 60 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2015, 10:24 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Foustanellas (2015), 125 O.R. (3d) 539 Building contracts – interpretation – penalty clauses – liquidated damages clauses Thomas G. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
The general rule is that if a client gives her lawyer confidential information, the lawyer must not disclose it, and indeed cannot be compelled to disclose it, without the client’s permission. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Schneider Corp. (1998), 1998 CanLII 5121 (ON CA), 42 O.R. (3d) 177 (C.A.); Kerr v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
Simpsons-Sears Ltd., 1985 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1985] 2 S.C.R. 536, 52 O.R. (2d) 799 (note), 17 Admin. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Investment Dealers Association of Canada, 2009 ONCA 628 (CanLII), 98 O.R. (3d) 169 at paragraph 67. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:49 am by Administrator
McDonald (1998), 127 C.C.C. (3d) 57, 54 C.R.R. (2d) 189, 17 C.R. (5th) 1, 40 O.R. (3d) 641 (C.A.), et R. c. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:20 am by emagraken
CUPE (2001), 55 O.R. (3d) 541,149 O.A.C. 213). [157]      In the subject case, again, the defendant was acquitted of criminal charges with regards to the same incident that gave rise to this civil action. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Ontario (Minister of Natural Resources) 2003 CanLII 43991 (ON SCDC), (2003), 66 O.R. (3d) 370 (Div. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 4:50 am by Robichaud
McDonald (1998), 40 O.R. (3d) 641 (C.A.), at paras. 31-32; Francis at para. 14. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 4:50 am by Robichaud
McDonald (1998), 40 O.R. (3d) 641 (C.A.), at paras. 31-32; Francis at para. 14. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:45 am by Hull and Hull LLP
The “wills exception” has been codified by cases such as Re: Ott, [1972] 2 O.R. 5 and Hope v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  In the Illinois Supreme Court, the case of In re Estate of Max Feinberg 2009 III. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Antonin Pribetic
  Based upon the principles of finality (res judicata and estoppel) and certainty, once a judgment has been rendered by a foreign court, a Canadian court cannot look into the merits. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
It’s not safe for a polluter to trust a subsequent owner to clean up contamination, even if the polluter has specifically paid for the cleanup, and even if the new owner signs a contract relieving the original polluter of liability. [read post]