Search for: "In re Opinion of the Judges" Results 41 - 60 of 19,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 4:06 am by SHG
 Perhaps David Boies, who contributed $10,000 to Cy’s re-election campaign when he was running unopposed, had something to do with it. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
The false alternate slate of electors was a “critical” part of the Trump-John Eastman conspiracy, according to a federal district court opinion issued in June. [read post]
14 May 2024, 3:26 pm by Alastair Clarke
In my humble opinion, we need a healthy dose of anxiety. [read post]
14 May 2024, 9:52 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  He still seems to believe (wrongly, in my opinion) that delay is his best strategy. [read post]
14 May 2024, 3:25 am
Ltd., Serial No. 90978154 (May 8, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The May 9, 2024, Opinion In a succinct May 9, 2024, Opinion, Delaware Superior Court Judge Sheldon K. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
As a result, judges have provided two landmark opinions in the last 45 days in favor of web scrapers. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:55 am
 In re MJ Cobalt, LLC, Serial No. 97673097 (May 9, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher C. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
"We're appellate judges; we don't like making snap decisions or decisions without lots of briefs or lots of lower court opinions. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew A. Seligman
” But that was a civil case, and the Fitzgerald opinion itself notes that criminal cases are different. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:00 am
" In re Limin Jiang, Serial Nos. 88921750 and 88921790 (May 8, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas L. [read post]
9 May 2024, 1:31 pm by Dennis Crouch
In the case, the CCPA majority opinion by Judge Rich upheld the regulation as within the USPTO’s rulemaking authority, rejecting the appellants’ arguments that it was contrary to statute and case law. [read post]
9 May 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Depending on where they live, many of those people would likely be reluctant to support Trump vocally.To be sure, a Trump voter could be reluctant to express their political opinion vocally whether they're a hold-your-noser or a crypto-fascist. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:19 am
In re BeBella Inc., Serial No. 97281194 (May 2, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Wendy B. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The list discusses specific IMR opinions which explain how physicians should best apply treatment guidelines utilizing the “Medical Evidence Search Sequence” for the treatment of injured workers as set forth in 8 Cal. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Adam Levitin
The rights of tens of thousands of women should not be determined by an Article I judge (or frankly any judge) who is effectively immune from appellate review. [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:57 am
In re Administrators of the Jean-Michel Basquiat Estate, Serial No. 97291105 (May 1, 2024) [not precedential] [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas L. [read post]