Search for: "In re Oracle"
Results 41 - 60
of 784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2016, 6:46 am
Tomorrow, the Oracle v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:21 pm
If you don’t know what an API is when you start reading the opinion, you’ll know what it is when you’re done. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:49 am
To keep things simple, I’ll use “Oracle” throughout this article to refer to Oracle or Sun.Mazer v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
In re Oracle Corp. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:10 am
As the re-trial in the Oracle v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 5:30 am
Oracle Corp., 2-08-cv-00371 (TXED December 8, 2009, Memorandum Opinion & Order) (Everingham, M.J.). [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 9:01 am
The court rejected Rimini Street's "we're just a proxy of our customers" defense in upholding the contract breach inducement claim based on getting customer passwords and rooting around Oracle's customer support database. [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 pm
In a litigation that has been going on since 2010 (we started covering it in 2011), a federal jury concluded last Thursday that Google’s Android operating system does not infringe Oracle-owned copyrights because its re-implementation of 37 Java APIs is protected by “fair use. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 9:22 am
Cal. answer filed July 2, 2007) You're an international corporate giant with some bad news in a high-profile case that you want to bury. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:36 am
So the re-retrial would take place on terms more favorable to Oracle than the last two "fair use" trials in this case.This case has been going on since August 2010. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:40 am
Outcomes will be collected electronically, though it is unclear whether Oracle is involved in this collection. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
In re Oracle Corp. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 12:20 pm
In her view, that move dramatically changes the amount of market harm that Oracle experienced, and the evidence should have been shared with the jury. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:21 am
Oracle, the owner of Java, then sued Google for copyright infringement in 2010. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
In re Oracle Corp. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:46 am
On December 4, 2019, Vice Chancellor Sam Glassock III issued a memorandum opinion in In re Oracle Corporation Derivative Litigation finding that the Lead Plaintiff in a shareholder derivative suit against Oracle’s board of directors had the right to subpoena documents relied upon by the corporation’s Special Litigation Committee (SLC) in making its determination as to whether litigation against Oracle should be allowed to proceed, including privileged… [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Oracle Copyrightability issue: Pam Samuelson: Supreme Court has 2x decided that functionality defeats ©ability for certain words/symbols when they constitute a system/method for accomplishing a useful result. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 8:01 am
In a re-retrial, a third jury might have to decide.Absent a settlement, this litigation may easily go into 2022 or even 2023.Even if Oracle obtained an injunction, it might be inconsequential as a result of licensing-related and/or technical changes on Google's side. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 5:30 am
General Re is a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, and the... [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:10 pm
I think we're in uncharted territory," said Eric Goldman, a respected legal scholar and the author of a popular technology law blog. [read post]
