Search for: "In re REFERENDUM PETITION NO. 1" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm by Michael Froomkin
This means that three out of four times, the appeal is denied and nobody knows why, except the judges and they’re not telling. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 7:03 am by Gritsforbreakfast
According to an enormous national survey, about 1/5th of all voters this year said the Black Lives Matter protests were a big factor in why they voted. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
There’s also a split among lower courts on this very issue, as the petition (cowritten by our very own John Elwood) also explains. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
So the people passed a referendum to punish legislators with too many absences from running for re-election. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
I think there are many First Amendment problems with the North Carolina Supreme Court decision, and the petition for Supreme Court review filed in this case (Packingham v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 7:11 am by INFORRM
A referendum on the amendments is scheduled for July 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am by Eugene Volokh
(Similar situations come up on occasion, I think, when people are gathering initiative or referendum signatures and opponents of the initiative or referendum come up to the person and angrily argue with him or condemn him, trying to deter others from coming to sign the petition.) [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 5:52 am by Samuel Cohen
The country’s most recent constitution, which it ratified by referendum in 1999, added two new governmental branches: (i) the citizen power; and (ii) the electoral power. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
FEC Allows Candidates to More Easily Pay Themselves from Campaign Funds MSN – Taylor Giorno (The Hill) | Published: 3/1/2024 A new rule allowing federal candidates to more easily draw salaries from their campaign funds went into effect on March 1. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
The probe relied on JCOPE’s re-interpretation of the state gift ban law. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Edward A. Fallone
The article is hosted on the website of the Initiative and Referendum Institute at the University of Southern California. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
But I do believe they are generally constitutionally permissible in many situations, given that property owners generally don't have a First Amendment right to exclude speakers or speech they dislike,[1] and given the broad acceptance of bans on discrimination based on religious affiliation. [read post]