Search for: "In re Search Warrant for Records From AT&T"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 12:41 pm
The government can’t get a warrant for “all records” in a computer, but broad categories such as “all records of gang-related activity” or “all records relating to violations of 21 U.S.C. 844″ have been upheld. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:13 am
So, if you’re going to have a burglar alarm, don’t have a grow operation or contraband left out in plain view.] [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:34 pm
The majority writes, in a key section, that "[t]he location information obtained from Carpenter's wireless carriers was the product of a search. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 12:35 pm
I think he does.If you're walking down the street carrying a backpack, a police officer can't simply search your backpack (having stopped you and told you to hand it over) because you DEFINITELY have a 4th Amendment expectation of privacy in its contents. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
In re Telephone Investigation We filed our first amicus brief in a case in California federal court, where a magistrate judge denied a government request for historical cell site records and ordered the government to seek a search warrant for the information. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:33 am
The court also determined the five-day delay from when the computer was seized until a search warrant was obtained was reasonable. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 12:07 pm
They obtained a search warrant for an extremely broad array of data related to the site, including all stored records of access to the site or communications with the site. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 7:35 am
Use this discussion to keep Ruiz fact-bound when faced with a lying cop in a search warrant application. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 2:53 pm
You're going to wait until a search warrant is issued to search their plans to massacre people in San Bernardino or blow up the twin towers before you move in? [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:40 am
If you’re aware of any controlling authority, please let me know. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
The court also examined unredacted copies of the search warrant and supporting affidavitpresented to the issuing judge, a copy of the applicable Terms of Service from Google, and an affidavit from a Google manager, all submitted by the People.People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:08 am
Obviously, requiring a search warrant couldn’t conceivably give criminals “the upper hand,” but would deny law enforcement the “upper hand” in using technology to extend their reach to places they otherwise couldn’t go. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:02 am
That's the basic idea of the undercover agent cases and the third-party doctrine based on them: When you have a transaction with someone, the person you're transacting with is allowed to record what they're experiencing without their experience being a "search" of you. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:31 am
The search warrant affidavit isn't a publicly available document — at least not at this stage of the case. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
They then obtained another warrant to get records of the other three. [read post]
31 May 2017, 12:07 pm
Why We're Suing the FBI for Records About Best Buy Geek Squad InformantsElectronic Frontier Foundation, May 31, 2017Sending your computer to Best Buy for repairs shouldn’t require you to surrender your Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
Here’s a representative quote from a Ninth Circuit opinion, which was in turn quoting a trial court opinion by Judge Kozinski: [T]he process of searching the files at the scene can take a long time. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
In the Amerindo securities fraud case, the search warrant was way overbroad ($25M in securities were at issue in a company that managed $1.2B), and all the records of the company fell within the warrant. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
It’s important to note that arrest warrants are different from search warrants. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm
” The Court re-listed the case a few times, suggesting a possible dissent from denial of certiorari or a summary reversal. [read post]