Search for: "In re Steven T."
Results 41 - 60
of 4,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 9:55 am
“I don’t think you’re going to [...] [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 2:15 am
I’M NOT HAPPY ABOUT THE DEMS BECOMING MORE FILIBUSTER-PROOF, BUT I CAN’T REALLY MIND THIS TOO MUCH: Ted Stevens loses re-election bid. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
So we're left with ... a vibrating sleepy chair. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:39 am
It's possible that this is just a coincidence, but by indicting a very powerful Republican Senator, the Mukasey Justice Department---which has already agreed to the Inspector General's recommendations---sends a not-so-subtle signal, namely: Don't worry about politicization; that's old news; now we're just doing our lawyerly jobs as professional prosecutors. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:21 pm
It makes me a bit uncomfortable, however, that (a) the conference is styled “The Finest Legal Mind”: A Symposium in Celebration of Justice John Paul Stevens; (b) the conference is stacked with former Stevens clerks, and former clerks rarely criticize their Justices in public; and (c) also consistent with the celebration theme, I don’t see any speaker listed who is likely be critical of the ideological thrust of Justice Stevens’s… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
Anyway, you're faced with a case that presents question 1 at a time when the Court hasn't yet decided question 2. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:48 am
ACCORDING TO WASHINGTON POST WRITER STEVEN PEARLSTEIN ON NPR, we’re stuck in a recession because businessmen are dumb and just parrot whatever they hear in the country club locker room. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Isn't an uncertainty for a copyright user also an uncertainty for the holder? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:44 pm
JOHN PAUL STEVENS: Well, I really don't think it's correct to say I changed my mind about it. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 1:00 am
That Doesn’t Mean the Case Can’t Settle. appeared first on The Blog of Steven Mehta. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:45 pm
(After all, we all kinda knew Stevens was going to retire soon. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:30 pm
"Isn't it a fact that you're calling it a loan when it's actually your chair? [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:25 am
If you're interested in fairness opinions, and let's be honest - who isn't? [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:26 am
" But hey, we're good sports, so we'll blog about them. 'Cause one of these days, they might actually turn out to be true -- and we wouldn't want to be caught flat-footed. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:26 am
" But hey, we're good sports, so we'll blog about them. 'Cause one of these days, they might actually turn out to be true -- and we wouldn't want to be caught flat-footed. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:28 pm
“We’re both lawyers,” said the husband. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:30 pm
So that payment assumes that the employer is exposed to the whole cost of the procedure, otherwise the employer wouldn't have that excess money to pay out, isn't that correct? [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:27 am
Then he wouldn't be directly threatening our constitutional rights, just informing us that we're mistaken about the existence of one of them. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:00 pm
Update: Steven Sotloff's parents are also now saying they were threatened with prosecution if they tried to raise the ransom money. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 6:25 pm
But there's also a substantial quality of service issue: see, for example, Steven M. [read post]
