Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Child Support" Results 41 - 60 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2022, 4:14 am by Emma Snell
The bill, dubbed the Supreme Court Police Parity Act, passed in the Senate by unanimous consent last month and would provide security protections for immediate family members of Supreme Court justices and “any officer” who works for the bench if the court marshal “determines such protection is necessary. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:40 am by JURIST Staff
In Morgentaler, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that criminalizing abortions performed at nonaccredited hospitals without the approval of a Therapeutic Abortion Committee constituted a violation of section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [read post]
8 May 2022, 3:29 am by SHG
The reactions to Quindlen’s question were non-responsive, but if the decision yet to come from the Supreme Court reaches as far as the draft suggests it will, dodging or deflecting this question isn’t going to work. [read post]
6 May 2022, 10:35 am by kblocher@hslf.org
Supreme Court in support of states’ rights to legislate to protect their citizens. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court justices, a topic that has gained importance recently with revelations that Ginni Thomas, the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, supported efforts to challenge the 2020 presidential election results. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 2:20 pm by David Super
Joe Manchin(D-WV) and Susan Collins(R-ME) announced that they would be voting to confirm Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:04 am by SHG
Her supporters hyped up this aspect of her career, the first public defender to be nominated to the Supreme Court, as being big. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project has published a summary of Re B, R & G (a Child) [2022] EWHC 320 (Fam), in which the local authority was applying for reporting restrictions for the trial of G and E’s parents, who were charged with the murder of E. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 4:59 pm by David Super
  Even the Court sometimes treatsappropriations acts as junior statutes. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 7:27 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
If they’re sincere, they’re setting themselves up for disappointment when EARN IT’s sponsors refuse to fix its problems. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am by Cyberleagle
Most recently of all, the Home Secretary is reported to have gained Cabinet support for powers for Ofcom (the regulator that would implement, supervise and enforce the Bill’s provisions) to require use of technology to proactively seek out and remove illegal content and legal content harmful to children. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
His decision to contest the order is supported by the National Union of Journalists, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 11:38 am by gabrielagendreau
NARF is looking for an attorney with excellent research and writing skills to assume a docket including complex litigation, appeals, some legislative matters, and assistance with the Tribal Supreme Court Project and Judicial Selection Project. [read post]
In related news, the Russian Supreme Court ordered the liquidation Tuesday of Memorial International, a regional branch of which Dmitriev had chaired prior to his arrest. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:28 am by Cindy Cohn
We’re thankful for our roughly 38,000 members who not only support us financially but spring into action whenever it's needed. [read post]
A significant reason for the persistent and yawning justice gap is that state supreme courts and state bars have long limited who can provide legal services. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 1:00 am by Christian Romero
That bill was so roundly ridiculed that it never actually even got formally introduced in any committees or anything, much less went anywhere further beyond that. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Weyker urging the Supreme Court to resolve the circuit split on that question and to reverse an Eighth Circuit ruling that there is no constitutional remedy against a Special Deputy U.S. [read post]