Search for: "In re Telecommunications, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2008, 11:02 am
Verizon Communications, Inc. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
Tail-Waggers of Hilton Head, Inc., Opposition No. 91177475 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark TAIL-WAGGERS GOURMET PET BAKERY & BOUTIQUE & Design for "retail gourmet pet food bakery and pet store" [GOURMET PET BAKERY & BOUTIQUE disclaimed] on the ground of likely confusion with the registered mark WAGTAILS for animal treats, scrap books, and pet beds].June 18, 2009 - 2 PM: In re Centennial Communications Corp., Serial No. 76283603… [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
October 26, 2023 - 1 PM: Caterpillar, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 9:04 pm
” Citing Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 10:32 am
AT&T Inc et al, U.S. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:17 am
Issue re: means-plus-function: The parties disputed whether the term "telecommunications means" is in means-plus-function format. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:20 am
On the other hand, masking and proxy services can also be used to frustrate a trademark holder’s claim of abusive registration, TDS Telecommunications Corporation v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:25 am
Snapchat, Inc., No. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:42 am
July 13, 2023 - 11 AM: In re Molina Healthcare, Inc., Serial Nos. 90887104 and 90887134 [Refusals to register MY HEALTH PERKS and MOLINA MY HEALTH PERKS for "Providing information in the fields of health and wellness," absent a disclaimer of "HEALTH PERKS. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., 642 F. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., 642 F. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
In re Viterra Inc., 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:10 pm
[TTABlog note: I am informed that Applicant's attorney will appear via videconference from California].November 7, 2006 2 PM: In re Apotex Inc., Serial Nos. 76449597 and 78429952 [2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals of IPHARMACIST and I PHARMACIST for various goods and services relating to pharmacies and pharmaceuticals].November 14, 2006 10 AM: In re Cooper, Serial No. 78462908 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of ERSOP for "administration of… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:30 am
According to the agreement, the following ISPs are participating: "SBC Internet Services, Inc., BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Wisconsin Bell, Inc., The Southern New England Telephone Company, and BellSouth… [read post]
7 May 2020, 2:00 am
And many are doing an exceptional job,” says Nate Butki of Root Inc. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:54 am
& Des. and the common-law mark TELETECH for engineering and consulting services in the field of telecommunications].November 10, 2009 - 10 AM: Directed Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 2:16 pm
Serial No. 78438594 [Refusal to register the design mark shown below for an electronic nurse call system, on the ground that the mark is merely decorative or informational and fails to function as a trademark].June 26, 2007 - 10 AM: In re Sungard Reference Data Solutions Inc., Serial No. 78212906 [Section 2(d) refusal of REFERENCEPOINT for computer software for use by energy providers, and by commodities, futures, stock, and bond traders, in light of the registered mark REFERENCE… [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 4:54 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided..August 8, 2007 - 10:30 AM: In re Annie's Homegrown, Inc., Serial No. 78524961 [Section 2(e)(1) refusal of FRUIT BUNNIES as merely descriptive of dehydrated fruit snacks that Applicant concedes will be shaped like bunnies].August 14, 2007 - 11 AM: In re Microvision Optical, Inc., Serial No. 78519618 [Section 2(d) refusal of FRAMELOCK for eyeglass frames and fasteners, in… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:28 am
[www.nylj.com]
In re Capellan, petitioner v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
Patent Nos. 7,479,949, RE 41,922, 7,863,533, 7,789,697, 7,912,501, D558,757, and D618,678. [read post]
