Search for: "In re Vidal"
Results 41 - 60
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2022, 5:59 am
We’re working hard to make your transition to filing patent applications in DOCX as seamless as possible. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:12 am
Vidal, Civil Case No. l:21CV681 (E.D. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:31 am
We can speak to you not only about our student opportunities while you’re in school, but also full-time opportunities after you graduate. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:15 pm
My personal favorites include:• The award-winning “You’re Smart. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 6:37 am
" We're told that Jackie said the queen was "pretty heavy going," and when Gore Vidal related Jackie's complaint to Princess Margaret, she said, "But that’s what she’s there for. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:15 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Palo Alto Networks, Inc., 22-145, — F.4th — (Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:24 am
Blog by Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTOThe United States is a global leader in new drug development. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 5:38 am
Blog by Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTOFrom left: USPTO staff worked with second graders on their science and engineering projects at Cora Kelly School for Math, Science, and Technology in Alexandria, VA on April 26, 2022; Secretary Raimondo and Director Vidal met with Urban Alliance interns at the USPTO on July 11, 2022; Legal Experience and Advancement Program proceedings at the USPTO; inventor Lonnie Johnson at a… [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 11:32 pm
"Interestingly, they're not saying anything about SEP arbitration proceedings. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:44 pm
In the meantime, new USPTO Director Kathi Vidal has narrowed the circumstances under which discretionary denials of PTAB IPR petitions can issue, and that may be a factor here.In the SEP case (Inv. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
Blog by Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTOThe great-granddaughter of inventor Edward Bullard visits the exhibit dedicated to his invention, the hard hat, at the National Inventors Hall of Fame Museum (Photo courtesy of the National Inventors Hall of Fame)The National Inventors Hall of Fame (NIHF) Museum is now open to the public! [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:21 pm
Litigants can still quote the 2019 statement (if they're enforcing their SEPs, particularly if they pursue injunctions) or the 2013 statement (if they're defending against infringement complaints), but both have been withdrawn, so they are just history, not current policy.So who has won this battle and who has lost? [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:58 am
Vidal, covered on PatentlyO here. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:48 am
In re A. [read post]
24 May 2022, 11:35 am
Blog by Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTOOn World IP Day on April 26, Director Vidal met with representatives from the World Intellectual Property Organization, including Director General Daren Tang and Deputy Director Lisa Jorgenson (Photo by Patrick Barcia/USPTO)Since I was sworn in a little over a month ago, we at USPTO have hit the ground running. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 6:49 pm
I’m also embarrassed that I have no females on here; there are tons of fantastic female attorneys yet they’re all pretty much classy and not that controversial. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am
” This is a re-evaluation of the “same interest” test, where the focus is on advancing the interests of class members and avoiding [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
Vidal-Hall[9] concerned the first challenge of jurisdiction and in particular whether the court should allow the serving of proceedings on the defendant outside the jurisdiction under the Civil Procedure Rules[10]. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 11:08 am
Just a few weeks after the re-opening of airports on Nov. 15, a third wave of contagion hit the island. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
The Judge also noted the European Data Protection Board’s Guidelines 3/2018 on the Territorial Scope of the GDPR which re-enforce the jurisprudence, namely that the presence of one single employee may be sufficient to satisfy the “stable arrangement” threshold, but mere presence to that extent will not trigger the GDPR if the processing in question is not carried out in the context of the activities of the EU-based employee. [read post]
