Search for: "In re the Interest of J. R." Results 41 - 60 of 2,803
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 12:29 am
BANKRUPTCY COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAttorneys' Fees Lawyer Ordered to Pay Adversary's Legal Fees For Extending RICO Litigation for Three Years In re: R&J Ventures Inc. [read post]
29 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Here is what I believe to be the fourth successful petition for review (after R 7/09, R 3/10 and R 21/11). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:38 am by Dave
  As regards accommodation, which is after all what we’re interested in, Parker J said: It does not amount to a detailed operational plan dealing with the Claimant’s accommodation needs. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Bexis
June 16, 2011), it promises to be an interesting couple of weeks. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:23 am
Enseignements à la lumière des révoltes de 2010-2012 en Tunisie, en Egypte, en Libye et en Syrie” Shannonbrooke Murphy (Middlesex University): “Codifying the Right to Resist in International Law” Charlotte Steinorth (CEU), “Resolution 1973 and the Security Council’s Instrumental Turn to Democracy” Owen Taylor (School of Oriental and African Studies), ‘Between Reform, Revolution and a hard place: The political economy… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:57 am by Daniel Solove
If you’re interested in reviewing one of the books below, or any other recent title by Harvard or any other participating presses in our book review project, please email me. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 1:00 am by Diane Tweedlie
The signature may be replaced with a seal if the document has been produced using a computer and, if it has been automatically produced, R. 113(2) further defines that the employee's name need not be present. [read post]