Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of A. G."
Results 41 - 60
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2021, 4:15 pm
§ 453(g)(1) Dear Ms. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:40 pm
Briefs were filed on behalf of the State of California, by the office of Attorney General Edmund G. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am
It's just that Apple may have too many other antitrust matters on its plate. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 2:40 pm
Also, unless the collection of the back tax is in jeopardy, a levy cannot be made on any day on which the taxpayer is required to respond to an IRS summons ( Code Sec. 6331(g)). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm
They’re meant to encourage rigour. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
The court stated that litigants are entitled to discover whether an expert's opinions are his own or a mere parroting of what he or she was told by counsel.It is noted that there is currently a petition for re-argument en banc filed by the plaintiff pending before the Superior Court in this matter. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:27 am
Indeed, they may well be under these circumstances as well, but Inter arma enim silent lēgēs. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:03 pm
What was more likely to happen, especially when you’re dealing with similar kinds of governance, was that you develop hierarchies. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
And nothing about it impinges upon the paramountcy principle – welfare trumps all. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
The resolution read: “Recommending that the House of Representatives find Lois G. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
And we’re not done yet. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
And we’re not done yet. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 12:36 pm
" §7602(g). [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
" As Lindsay Kaufman, the author, observed "When you marry someone, you're marrying a family. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:43 am
If the latter, one way of thinking about the matter is that Mr. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:28 pm
As such, when the court is considering an adoption the best interests and welfare of the child should be the paramount consideration of the court…” In re Adoption of G., 89 N.J. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
Should the exemption nonetheless be denied, perhaps on the grounds that allowing blunt knives would either let people carry sharp knives claiming they’re blunt, or require too much checking on the part of police, guards, and others? [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:05 pm
The judicial task is to evaluate all the options, undertaking a global, holistic and (see Re G para 51) multi-faceted evaluation of the child’s welfare which takes into account all the negatives and the positives, all the pros and cons, of each option. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:37 am
See, e. g., Pickering, supra, at 568; Connick, supra, at 147; Rankin v. [read post]
