Search for: "In the Interest of: R.C."
Results 41 - 60
of 394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2022, 11:56 am
R.C. 5747.01(B). [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 12:03 pm
(foster parents) filed a similar case for the remaining child, R.C., in 2021. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:24 am
At argument this morning, Plaintiff conceded that Defendant is operating out of this ethical concern, and is motivated in good faith by its interpretation of the patient's best interests. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 2:00 am
In a divorce, the statute that establishes that is R.C. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 7:42 am
See R.C. 5751.42. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm
In 2015, Shauna Hall-Coates wrote in the Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, Walk into any courtroom today, critics venture, and it will look stunningly similar to those of the past; the judge will be sitting behind the bench, the jury in its box, and the witness on the stand.1 As everyone settles into his or her place selected by centuries of ritual and status quo, the courtroom may even appear as a sanctuary from the trappings of digital technology, so doggedly pursued outside its walls. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:33 am
In case you folks are interested, here is our argument: Summary of Argument In Tinker v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 12:41 pm
Even if there is a compelling governmental interest in protecting people from abuse, harassment, and mental distress, barring a broad range of public criticism cannot be narrowly tailored to serve that interest. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 9:24 am
Even if there is a compelling governmental interest in protecting people from abuse, harassment, and mental distress, barring a broad range of public criticism cannot be narrowly tailored to serve that interest. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
" The order did not define "personal identifying information," but the only statute that defines the phrase, R.C. 2913.49(A), defines it to include a person's "name. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 6:44 am
“We can consider the interests of all parties or the goals they wish to achieve, as well as the options for their actions. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Even if there is a compelling governmental interest in protecting people from abuse, harassment, and mental distress, barring a broad range of public criticism cannot be narrowly tailored to serve that interest. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:35 am
Two judges dissent: Federal courts have recognized initial-interest confusion, and we should recognize it too. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:45 am
“Irrespective of whether R.C. 2107.24 allows incompetent witnesses to establish that a document is a will, the voiding provision of R.C. 2107.15 applies to devises contained in any will. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:44 am
” It would not surprise me if the Ohio legislature takes a greater interest in the concurrence. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
" The order did not define "personal identifying information," but the only statute that defines the phrase, R.C. 2913.49(A), defines it to include a person's "name. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 10:58 am
R.C. 5733.40(H). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
The court held that the orders couldn't be upheld under "strict scrutiny," i.e., as "the least restrictive means to achieve a compelling state interest": Assuming, without deciding, that there is a compelling state interest in protecting civil-stalking victims from fear of imminent physical harm or mental distress, the means chosen here are not the least restrictive. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm
The Department determined that public interest will be best served by issuing licenses to individuals who meet certain criteria, and in accordance with R.C. 3905.09(A)(4), the Superintendent will issue temporary major line resident agent licenses (“temporary licenses”) to qualifying individuals. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am
Therefore, R.C. 2107.15—Ohio’s voiding statute—does not apply to a noncomplying will under R.C. 2107.24. [read post]
