Search for: "In the Interest of B. Children"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2008, 5:56 pm
While the proceedings below are pretty interesting, this comes down to a question of whether the government has discretion to move for a § 3E1.1(b) (responsibility) (as opposed to (a)) reduction for acceptance of responsibility. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:41 pm
Posted by Michelle May O'Neil It's never too late to do what's in the best interests of your children. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 7:38 pm
(b) The notice applicable to a proceeding for a declaratory judgment under Chapter 37, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, applies to a proceeding under Subsection (a). [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:34 am
(b) Subsection (a) is the exclusive jurisdictional basis for making a child-custody determination by a court of this State. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
INA 237(a)(4)(B) also renders a noncitizen who is described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) and INA § 212(a)(3)(D) removable. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:48 pm
§ 2252A(1)(a)(5)(B). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:53 pm
The 19th Annual Howard B. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm
The Court of Appeal Decision The Court of Appeal stated: To award custody of the children to one parent as a consequence of the other parent’s failure to obey a court order is an error as it fails to consider or prioritize the children’s best interests. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm
The Court of Appeal Decision The Court of Appeal stated: To award custody of the children to one parent as a consequence of the other parent’s failure to obey a court order is an error as it fails to consider or prioritize the children’s best interests. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
There will be repeals and amendments of a number of pieces of primary legislation, in particular s12 Administration of Justice Act 1960, s97 Children Act 1989 and s39 Children and Young Persons act 1933. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
A recent study by Kristina Olson and Alex Shaw from Yale attempted to discover the approximate age in which children begin to believe that plagiarism is wrong.The study showed children between the ages of 3 and 11 “videos and puppet vignettes” about that featured art students. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:36 pm
The 24th Annual Howard B. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:30 am
The mother didn’t admit to the allegations in the petition nor was a trial held, however, the trial court dismissed the petition.Oakland Circuit court’s reasoning for dismissal was that it was impossible to establish jurisdiction since the children, placed with their father, were safe; and, since it was unlikely that the children would ever see their mother, assuming jurisdiction over them wasn’t in the interests of judicial economy.Analysis: DHHS, in… [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 8:48 am
The hearing was Monday morning.The attorneys argued that a recent Indiana statute prohibiting those convicted of sex offenses against children from living within 1,000 feet of a school, youth program center or public park is in the community's best interest. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:05 am
The court will also look at the present home environment and whether the child is prospering within that environment.Is the child adjusting well in school, getting along with other children, keeping his/her grades up? [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 2:14 am
Many people believe the courts allow children to choose where they want to live and with which parent. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 9:13 am
Contact with both parents is generally in the children’s best interests. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 6:27 pm
The character of the classification; and B. the individual interests affected; and C. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 6:23 am
That last post linked to the Oklahoma statute regarding at what age does a child have a say in custody matters.I have said before that Indiana children never have a deciding voice in custody matters. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 6:09 pm
Children's Heart Center, Ltd., d/b/a Rush's Children's Heart Center, et al., No. 1-09-1217, will be remanded to the trial court for a retrial that will exclude the defendant's cardiology expert's testimony. [read post]
