Search for: "In the Interest of PP "
Results 41 - 60
of 3,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
Again, much of this is well known and generations of interested people have developed their own arc of intersubjective dialectic about the subjective dialectics of the liberal democratic collective order. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 9:27 pm
This is because it is the State that determines the jurisdiction of its courts in order to serve the public interest, i.e. to ensure justice, which is one of its primary functions, and to maintain order and peace within its territory. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
We discuss this alternate view on pp. 396-397 of Part III: We acknowledge that there is, and has been, a long-standing, alternate, minority view—the Impeachment Clause only requires the remedy of removal for the three expressly-listed classes of positions: "[1] The President, [2] Vice President and [3] all civil Officers of the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
And allocation procedures open to managers have allowed them to delay or accelerate impairment depending on their own interests. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
(Pp. 307-21.) [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:49 am
Finally, the following book review by Fausto Pocar, Emeritus Professor at the University of Milan, is featured: Albert Venn DICEY, John Humphrey Carlile MORRIS, Lawrence COLLINS, Dicey, Morris & Collins on The Conflict of Laws, 16th ed., Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2022, 2 voll., pp. cdxli-2476-LXXI; Companion vol., EU Withdrawal Transition Issues, pp. li-162. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 8:55 pm
In a dramatic succession of recent cases, courts in these three countries have been innovative, acted with a high degree of independence, and appear legitimately interested in defending democratic norms. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:32 am
(O’Brien, pp. 104-105). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Although some investors certainly prefer to have more control rights, control may not serve the interests of others. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:17 am
Roberts, Jr., 2023 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary (December 31, 2023), pp. 5-7). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:48 pm
One can read with a lot of interest the contribution of Yuko Nishitani (Kyoto University) in this book on “Comparative Conflict of Laws” (pp. 674-692). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am
By Hon. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 8:10 pm
See also idem, “One Year of Civil Family Law in the United Arab Emirates: A Preliminary Assessement”, Arab Law Quarterly, Vol. 37 (2023), pp. 5-6. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:23 am
See Chief Justice Roberts, at pp. 5-7. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
Twin Cities Area New Party, 520 U.S. 351, 364 (1997) (“States certainly have an interest in protecting the integrity, fairness, and efficiency of their ballots and election processes as means for electing public officials. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Wade (pp. 50-52). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:21 am
Pix ©Larry Catá Backer 2024I am delighted to share a discussion draft of the essay--Social Listening and Infodemic—An Epidemiology for the Body Politic. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Consequently, South Africa had to present its claims as genocide claims, notwithstanding the fact that other legal frameworks – most obviously, international humanitarian law (IHL) – seem more appropriate for evaluating the legality of Israel’s military campaign and the difficult questions it raises about the balance struck between military necessity and the protection of humanitarian interests. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Nevertheless, the matter has become the subject of intense public interest. [read post]
