Search for: "In the Matter Of: Sealed Appellant, Appellant,"
Results 41 - 60
of 622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Borkan v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Brown v Velez, 153 AD3d 517, the Appellate Division observed that at an administrative expungement hearing to determine whether a report of child abuse or maltreatment is substantiated, the allegations in the report must be established "by a preponderance of the evidence"*. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Brown v Velez, 153 AD3d 517, the Appellate Division observed that at an administrative expungement hearing to determine whether a report of child abuse or maltreatment is substantiated, the allegations in the report must be established "by a preponderance of the evidence"*. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:51 am
Of course, the parties who want the documents sealed may end up not winning; but, again, they aren't legally entitled to sealing just as a matter of mutual agreement. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm
Further, because of the sensitive subject matter, § 6851 allows plaintiffs to use a pseudonym to protect their privacy. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
[5.1] The objection of possible double patenting was raised by the respondent with respect to the auxiliary requests submitted by the appellant with letter of 30 October 2009. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:42 pm
” Sealed court records also prevent people from learning about matters that may be of profound public concern. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
All official records and papers relating to the youthful offender proceeding were sealed as confidential pursuant to CPL 720.35. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:33 pm
In this, the Daughter submits two cases, which she alleges mandate that the records be sealed in this matter. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 4:43 pm
Nicholas Jerome Seals and Lewis Alexander Seals, affirming the convictions of both appellants for felony murder and remanding Nicholas Seals’s case only for a correction of his sentence. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:03 am
Department of Defense (Case No. 12-5137), the appellate court upheld a trial court's decision last year that graphic photos involving slain terrorist leader Osama bin Laden were exempt from having to be produced under the Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. sec. 552].The three appellate judges, Judith Rogers, Merrick Garland and Harry Edwards, said the CIA properly withheld the 52 images of bin Laden concerning his death and burial pursuant to FOIA's Exemption 1, which protects… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
While whistleblowers filed only 8% of FCA matters in 1987, they filed 80% of FCA matters in 2010. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:53 am
Of course, the parties who want the documents sealed may end up not winning; but, again, they aren't legally entitled to sealing just as a matter of mutual agreement. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:08 am
Officials eventually unsealed most of the cases, saying they should have never been sealed, but left docket sheets for 40 others - primarily divorces, child custody matters and paternity lawsuits - for Beach to consider. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
If the debate on a particular topic had been closed without announcement of a decision on the matter, the board has discretion over whether or not it re-opens the debate and over the extent to which it does so (see Reasons, point 3.1).3. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 5:15 pm
In support of their contention that court records may be sealed if matters contained therein are deemed embarrassing. [read post]
29 May 2008, 12:55 am
" Dockery challenged the decision, contending that "911 recordings" were improperly admitted into evidence.The Appellate Division rejected Dockery's objection, noting that:The 911 recordings were properly admitted into evidence at the disciplinary hearing since they were not official records relating to petitioner's arrest or prosecution, and thus were not subject to the sealing statute, citing Matter of Harper v Angiolillo, 89 NY2d 761; and Even… [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:36 am
Another notable step taken by the Court in J.C. was to restrict access to the underlying records in the case, effectively sealing them. [read post]
