Search for: "In the Matter of Acker"
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 10:09 am
Acker, The Flipside Injustice Of Wrongful Convictions: When The Guilty Go Free, 76 ALB. [read post]
17 May 2018, 10:36 am
Grimes, 631 So.2d 205, 207 (Fla.1989); Acker v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 1:58 pm
As reported in the New York Times on Jan. 14, “[h]ackers brought down dozens of Ukrainian government websites,” posting a message on dark screens that read: “Be afraid and expect the worst. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
Acker, 527 U.S. 423, 431 (1999). [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
This is the same date of Judge Acker's December 8, 2006 Order. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
SIXTH UPDATE: This has got to be kind of like getting a paper cut after you've lost your legs, but in another matter, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals turned down Scruggs' petition for a writ of mandamus against Judge Acker, in the Renfroe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:44 am
Attorney for Northern Alabama, and for whatever reason, did decline to prosecute, but Acker, a judge one would do well not to anger, appointed special prosecutors in Alabama who are going after Scruggs on that charge -- if you need more background, I've written a ton of posts on it, just type "Acker" in my blog's search bar to the right. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
The story asks the question everyone has been asking:To many legal observers, the indictment raises a hard question: What could lead a lawyer who once earned nearly $1 billion on a single case, the tobacco litigation, to bribe a judge over a matter of a few million dollars? [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 12:31 am
Whether or not the SKG may have represented the Labranos in some other matter does not bring them within the fold of the attorney-client or work product privileges here.It is equally plain that even if both Ms. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:14 am
Keker, as you recall, is defending Scruggs against a charge of criminal contempt of court instigated by federal Judge William Acker relating to the Renfroe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:11 pm
" Over the course of the litigation, Scruggs says, he paid these individuals well over $500,000.As mentioned the other day, Moore recently turned up assisting the Katrina Litigation Group (formerly Scruggs Katrina Group), and Y'All Politics and Folo are both buzzing about a deposition (PDF) David Rossmiller has publicized which, among other things, raises questions about whether Moore was playing a dual role in Katrina matters and how he was being compensated. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Co. of N.Y. v Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., 31 NY2d 436 [1972]; see also Travelers Ins. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:29 am
District Judge William Acker hit Scruggs with the contempt charges, claiming he defied an order when he refused to return documents to a claims-handling company working with State Farm Insurance Cos., instead handing them over to Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
Once the plaintiff elects to sue either the employee in his individual capacity or the governmental unit, subsection (a) or (b) will “immediately and forever” bar him from subsequently electing to sue the other regarding the same subject matter. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Lindsey, we noted that Texas has never recognized a cause of action for intentional interference with inheritance but left open the question whether we should do so.1 Today, to eliminate continuing confusion over the matter and resolve a split among the courts of appeals, we answer that question. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 12:16 am
"It's difficult to keep a matter like this quiet," Hood said. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:06 am
In his order recommending Scruggs for prosecution, Judge William Acker wondered why Scruggs would so this, unless it was so Scruggs and Hood could "bully" -- his word -- State Farm into the McFarland settlement. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:11 pm
Hamlin, 69 So.3d 1065, 1068 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing Acker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:13 am
Defense lawyer Joel Yunek pressed the doctor on the matter. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Acker, 527 U.S. 423, 431 (1999), and that he acted “under authority of federal law in the discharge of his duty and only by reason thereof,” Maryland v. [read post]
