Search for: "In the Matter of Acker"
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2009, 11:47 am
Acker, is a new book comprised of original chapters authored by nationally distinguished scholars. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:40 am
Acker, 140 N.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 9:41 pm
Co. of N.Y. v Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., 31 NY2d at 442 n 3; Kamyr, Inc. v St. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
.; from Bexar County; 4th district (04-06-00346-CV, 248 SW3d 314, 10-17-07)08-0128IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ROSEZELLER WILLICH, DECEASED; from Henderson County; 12th district (12-06-00409-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 12-21-07)motion to amend dismissed as moot08-0140CYNTHIA HIEGER AND ROY C. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
Having already confessed guilt, it is difficult to comprehend how the mere production of documents in an unrelated civil matter somehow increases the risk that they will incriminate themselves. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
The story asks the question everyone has been asking:To many legal observers, the indictment raises a hard question: What could lead a lawyer who once earned nearly $1 billion on a single case, the tobacco litigation, to bribe a judge over a matter of a few million dollars? [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
SIXTH UPDATE: This has got to be kind of like getting a paper cut after you've lost your legs, but in another matter, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals turned down Scruggs' petition for a writ of mandamus against Judge Acker, in the Renfroe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 12:44 am
I know within the federal system, an “independent special prosecutor” is often used in matters of this type. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 7:31 pm
They asked Acker to recuse himself from the Renfroe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 12:31 am
Whether or not the SKG may have represented the Labranos in some other matter does not bring them within the fold of the attorney-client or work product privileges here.It is equally plain that even if both Ms. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 10:18 am
District Court Judge William Acker ordered Scruggs to return the documents, Scruggs instead gave them to Hood, Acker wrote. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 12:16 am
"It's difficult to keep a matter like this quiet," Hood said. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:06 am
In his order recommending Scruggs for prosecution, Judge William Acker wondered why Scruggs would so this, unless it was so Scruggs and Hood could "bully" -- his word -- State Farm into the McFarland settlement. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
Lott into it (though with no allegation of criminality) by way of the Acker contempt matter, as distinct from either the Balducci/Lackey bribery attempt or, say, the Paul Minor affair. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:11 pm
" Over the course of the litigation, Scruggs says, he paid these individuals well over $500,000.As mentioned the other day, Moore recently turned up assisting the Katrina Litigation Group (formerly Scruggs Katrina Group), and Y'All Politics and Folo are both buzzing about a deposition (PDF) David Rossmiller has publicized which, among other things, raises questions about whether Moore was playing a dual role in Katrina matters and how he was being compensated. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:29 am
District Judge William Acker hit Scruggs with the contempt charges, claiming he defied an order when he refused to return documents to a claims-handling company working with State Farm Insurance Cos., instead handing them over to Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:44 am
Attorney for Northern Alabama, and for whatever reason, did decline to prosecute, but Acker, a judge one would do well not to anger, appointed special prosecutors in Alabama who are going after Scruggs on that charge -- if you need more background, I've written a ton of posts on it, just type "Acker" in my blog's search bar to the right. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:14 am
Keker, as you recall, is defending Scruggs against a charge of criminal contempt of court instigated by federal Judge William Acker relating to the Renfroe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:57 am
"An excerpt from the Scruggs brief:Aside from being factually wrong, the "sham" theory fails as a matter of law because the Injunction's law-enforcement exemption requires nothing more than a request from law-enforcement officials. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
This is the same date of Judge Acker's December 8, 2006 Order. [read post]
