Search for: "In the Matter of F. F.--Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Bell County"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit 1993). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit 2008). [read post]
28 May 2012, 8:58 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
Bell Sports, Inc., 651 F.3d 357 (3d Cir. 2011 Aldisert, J.). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm
DuvallDocket: 10-1468Issue(s): (1) Whether a claim by a pretrial detainee is established under the Due Process Clause as a matter of law by the presence of staph-infection-causing bacteria in a county jail and the fact that no legitimate, governmental purpose is served by the presence of such bacteria; (2) whether the lower court's application of Bell v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
The Court of Appeal reversed the reduction order, holding it violated the collateral source rule. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:41 pm
Courts construe contracts as a matter of law, and we review their rulings de novo. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
Court of Appeals, 626 F.3d 187 (4th Cir. 2010). [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 7:40 pm
Anthony Kirkland, 2010 Ohio 5729 (Ohio 1st App 11/24/2010) Under state law, where an appellant files both a capital and noncapital appeal for related offenses committed after 1994 those appeals should be solely in the Ohio Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Therefore, as a matter of apparent first impression, the District Court of Appeal held that the defendant was not a "wrongfully incarcerated person" entitled to compensation under the Victims of Wrongful Incarceration Compensation Act. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 646.214(b)(3) and (4), thereby preempting state-law claims of negligence.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Texas)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief for Constitutional and Administrative Law ScholarsPetitioners' reply Title: Lonberg v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Bell v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Bell and MelissaRobbins Contts for Real Party in Interest Quality Loan Service Corporation.Bryan Cave, Douglas E. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:49 am
" In this case, Bell failed to pay a child-support obligation in violation of an order issued by the Circuit Court of DuPage County in 1999. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
As a matter of law, this approval is granted only upon completion of the PMA process. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Plaintiff Candice Davis appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, in this FMLA action. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
From: Findlaw Case Summaries, September 5, 2008 Summaries from September 1-5, 2008. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
This appeal is from those two orders.1. [read post]
26 May 2007, 3:22 pm
To make such a prediction, the district court will examine: (1) state Supreme Court decisions in related areas; (2) "decisional law" of intermediate state courts; (3) opinions of federal courts of appeals and district courts applying state law; and (4) decisions from other jurisdictions that have discussed the issues before the court. [read post]
