Search for: "In the Matter of Jama"
Results 41 - 60
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2014, 1:41 pm
And when mistakes happen — and they will, no matter how good the care is — practitioners need to know. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:45 am
Meanwhile, a research letter in JAMA Internal Medicine caused a stir after finding that 43 percent of doctors in practice more than 30 years acknowledged... [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 7:01 am
As a matter of U.N. practice, when a designated individual is mentioned in the report, the individual’s designation number is included in parentheses. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:31 am
" According to Goldhammer, "clinical trials never capture all of the safety -- or, for that matter, efficacy value -- of a given drug. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:09 am
(JAMA Vol. 306, No.2, July 13, 2011.) [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:07 am
Jama v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 7:49 am
Professor Rodwin is on the faculty of the Suffolk University Law School; his piece on public ownership of health record data was published in JAMA earlier this month.The audio file of my interview with Marc Rodwin (about 20 minutes long) is available for download/podcast. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 7:51 pm
Scannell observes: "Doctors care about this issue because it deeply matters how their judgments and actions affect the lives of vulnerable patients and families. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
Smith, MD2,5Author Affiliations JAMA. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:35 am
A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) studied the correlation between ambulance diversion and mortality among heart attack victims in California. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 7:25 pm
That really ought to matter to people. [read post]
WELL, WHEN YOU POLITICIZE, YOU FORFEIT PUBLIC TRUST AND THERE’S A PRICE: Gun Query Off Limits for D…
10 Aug 2011, 5:40 am
A doctor has no duty to ask questions about matters that are unrelated to reaching a medical diagnosis and prescribing treatment. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Lazerow, Jama and Yohuru Williams, eds. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 12:40 pm
The study appeared in JAMA Neurology. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 3:25 pm
We agree with LeFevre’s conclusion that although screening tests will benefit some patients, "blind adherence to doing more whenever there is a possibility of good, no matter how remote that possibility is or how much harm is done in the process, should not be our approach." [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:19 am
" I would agree that the bar should be reasonably high for a SEP-based exclusion order, but there can be circumstances that justify such import bans.The final point in the HTIA's submission is consistent with something I've been saying, just that I approached the same question from a different angle: no matter what the U.S. will do, there are other jurisdictions in the world and SEP holders will enforce their rights elsewhere if they have to. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
However, it seems obvious to us that this interpretation of the First Amendment neither follows its original intent, nor promotes the public interest.The founding fathers clearly intended the First Amendment to guarantee the right of individuals to speak freely about religious and political matters, not the right of food companies to market junk foods to children and adults. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
Silberman goes on to discuss some other matters–including the incredibility of Almerfedi’s story. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:16 am
Justice Scalia wrote the book on statutory construction: A Matter Of Interpretation. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 7:26 am
La situation actuelle sur le #MSCMeraviglia Après avoir été refusé en Jamaïque, aux îles Caymans, il a pu accoster au Mexique après 3 jours de mer. [read post]
